Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?[SOLVED]

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

    No, modify your menu entry to reflect the proper command.

    Comment


      #17
      Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

      What should I put on the command? --enable-plugins??

      That don't work...

      Comment


        #18
        Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

        No when you open the menu item to edit it, in the properties is a field named "Command". It should read /usr/bin/chromium-browser --enable-plugins %U

        Comment


          #19
          Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

          I have flash working fine. What other plugins can I get working? And how? What about Java?

          I am really ready to dump Firefox ASAP.

          Comment


            #20
            Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

            Don't dump Firefox yet. Flash is the only plugin I can get working. As I have time, I will research how to make this thing usable and post back.

            Comment


              #21
              Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

              Originally posted by larbac
              What should I put on the command? --enable-plugins??

              That don't work...

              You need to right click on the menu icon in the panel and select Menu Editor, then go to Internet, click on the + and right click on Chrome.

              Comment


                #22
                Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

                Hi


                Already changed the menu, but it doesn't enable the plugin.

                One other thing. Where you say /usr/bin/chromium-browser --enable-plugins &U, it should be ....%U, right?

                I tryied both ways and no go.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

                  Originally posted by larbac
                  it should be ....%U, right?
                  I corrected it.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

                    It only works using the command on Terminal.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

                      Originally posted by larbac
                      It only works using the command on Terminal.
                      Please note that if you are trying to run by clicking favourites then you need to delete the current icon and reinstate from the Internet sub menu

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

                        I am not going to have time to follow up on this for a couple of weeks. Meanwhile I suggest you read this thread.

                        http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1207863

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

                          Odd thing is, when I installed it on my Acer Aspire One, running the Ubuntu netbook remix, ALL, and I mean ALL plugins were installed. Flash, Java, quicktime, and many more. I don't know how I did it, but I sure would like it to be that way on my desktop.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

                            I think that having alternative (fundamentally different) browsers is terrific, because if something is not working in one, you can try in the next one. Right now we have:

                            * Konqueror (khtml based; KDE libs)
                            * Arora (webkit based; Qt libs)
                            * Opera (in-house prop engine; Qt libs)
                            * Firefox (gecko based; Gtk libs)
                            * Chrome (webkit based; Gtk libs) [1]

                            [1] http://dev.chromium.org/developers

                            The list order corresponds to how native they look in KDE, according to the GUI libraries they use. Qt is the basis for KDE, and gtk the basis for GNOME.

                            For everyday use, unless you have very slow connection or very slow hardware, it's hard to beat Firefox as a powerhorse, because they go one thing right: build a platform, not just a browser. People keep building cool extensions, and some of them are very useful. It also works fine with most pages. Khtml is the less robust engine, but Konqueror is the more universal browser (from man pages to remote systems via ssh, plus the web, filesystem, photo-camera, and what not). Webkit, based on khtml, is a lot better. Opera is great overall, and it has its cool Widgets, but it's closed source.

                            Ok, my 2 cts. Maybe I should post this in a more visible place for newbies ...

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

                              Originally posted by gutty96
                              Odd thing is, when I installed it on my Acer Aspire One, running the Ubuntu netbook remix, ALL, and I mean ALL plugins were installed. Flash, Java, quicktime, and many more. I don't know how I did it, but I sure would like it to be that way on my desktop.
                              Just a guess, but is the laptop running 32 bit and the Desktop 64 bit?

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Re: Chrome browser? Any PPA ? And Flash/Java plugin?

                                You know what, yes that would be the case.

                                Never even crossed my mind, lol.




                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X