Hello,
I would appreciate some help.
I have just move to Kubutu from windows and I used to use unix system to run CAD packages so have some understanding "well some". I have everything almost the way I like it. I have to say well done to ubuntu using the KDE desktop, very friendly now.
Right the problem is I have a NAS drive from iomega drive wired into a wireless router at //192.168.0.10/public/
I run an alt f2 command with smb://192.168.0.10/ (return) and it opens the drive to show the public directory but when I click it it returns "The process for the smb://192.168.0.10 protocol died unexpectedly"
I have tried several different helps and used the terminal to ls the files, it only lists the public and not the contents.
What I am after is a drive which is static when the pc turns on so I don't need to set it up every time.
I can map it through win4lin and access all the files so I jest need to map it on kubuntu.
any help? plese keep the terminal text explanation simple if you can. or tell me what its doing.
Richard
I would appreciate some help.
I have just move to Kubutu from windows and I used to use unix system to run CAD packages so have some understanding "well some". I have everything almost the way I like it. I have to say well done to ubuntu using the KDE desktop, very friendly now.
Right the problem is I have a NAS drive from iomega drive wired into a wireless router at //192.168.0.10/public/
I run an alt f2 command with smb://192.168.0.10/ (return) and it opens the drive to show the public directory but when I click it it returns "The process for the smb://192.168.0.10 protocol died unexpectedly"
I have tried several different helps and used the terminal to ls the files, it only lists the public and not the contents.
What I am after is a drive which is static when the pc turns on so I don't need to set it up every time.
I can map it through win4lin and access all the files so I jest need to map it on kubuntu.
any help? plese keep the terminal text explanation simple if you can. or tell me what its doing.
Richard
Comment