I noticed this awhile back but saw it again this morning and thought it odd. Really just wondering if anyone else sees this:
When I do "lsblk" which is aliased as "lsblk -fl --sort name" I get this:
The odd thing is two of these "drives" don't exist! There is no sdc or sdd installed on my system. No other tools report them that I've noticed so it must be related to lsblk itself. Also there are two other unused SATA ports which would be sde and sdf but those went to removable devices as one would expect.
It's not really worrisome, but I found it odd.
When I do "lsblk" which is aliased as "lsblk -fl --sort name" I get this:
Code:
stuart@office:~/Downloads$ lsblk NAME FSTYPE FSVER LABEL UUID FSAVAIL FSUSE% MOUNTPOINTS nvme0n1 nvme0n1p1 nvme0n1p2 swap 1 1ae06117-4c44-450c-b3e5-ceefa4de0d86 [SWAP] nvme0n1p3 btrfs BLADE1 5964f1aa-2e8e-48e1-a3e3-f2069bd6217c 215.8G 55% /subvol /home / nvme0n1p4 ext4 1.0 vm_drive dd295020-bb4d-4061-9b5f-76333183ab9b 122.1G 65% /mnt/vm_drive nvme1n1 nvme1n1p1 nvme1n1p2 btrfs 247e6a5b-351d-4704-b852-c50964d02ee6 nvme2n1 nvme2n1p1 nvme2n1p2 btrfs 79f961eb-b2b4-4ab6-a0ca-798e0229bf70 sda sda1 sda2 btrfs storage 34f7d49b-ebf1-4d06-a899-2de14ee92b5d sdb sdb1 sdb2 btrfs root_backup 77de9ade-e3ad-42fb-a400-84493de9827f 380.5G 59% /mnt/root_backup sdb3 ext4 1.0 vm_backup 38c1cdd4-7ca3-4e34-81e1-4a04f6b6ae78 sdc sdd sde sde1 exfat 1.0 tss_files F7BC-F6B2 49.9G 14% /media/stuart/tss_files sdf sdf1 exfat 1.0 travel_docs 7461-F49D sdg sdg1 ntfs ineo 0E92D1D079B1C8D8 sr0
It's not really worrisome, but I found it odd.
Comment