The new FX seems better, to me. Faster. For example, faster upon clicking on a link--either on the same page or opening a new tab (for the clicked-upon site).
Browser talk now ... I do not now have my NoScript (or any replacement) on the new FX. And, boy, ain't that nice! ;-) NoScript (and others) are nice, but there are times where you simply can't get a website to work well with it on (and by incrementally allowing scripts down the list). Can be very frustrating at times. And about browsers, Chromium is the go-to browser I use when FX isn't doing the job well enough. However, there are sites for which FX is better, and there are sites where Chromium is better. Specifically, my Chromium may falter, but then FX will work perfectly on the same site/task.
Strange.
Anyway, so far I have no complains about the FX 57.0 (on Kubuntu 14.04); and it appears it is running better/faster on some things--so far.
Looks like we started two threads on the new FX (the other thread focussing more on automatics updates, security, choice).
Browser talk now ... I do not now have my NoScript (or any replacement) on the new FX. And, boy, ain't that nice! ;-) NoScript (and others) are nice, but there are times where you simply can't get a website to work well with it on (and by incrementally allowing scripts down the list). Can be very frustrating at times. And about browsers, Chromium is the go-to browser I use when FX isn't doing the job well enough. However, there are sites for which FX is better, and there are sites where Chromium is better. Specifically, my Chromium may falter, but then FX will work perfectly on the same site/task.
Strange.
Anyway, so far I have no complains about the FX 57.0 (on Kubuntu 14.04); and it appears it is running better/faster on some things--so far.
Looks like we started two threads on the new FX (the other thread focussing more on automatics updates, security, choice).
Comment