If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You will have to register
before you can post. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Please do not use the CODE tag when pasting content that contains formatting (colored, bold, underline, italic, etc).
The CODE tag displays all content as plain text, including the formatting tags, making it difficult to read.
I could not agree with this more. The current LTS should always be identified with LTS. Otherwise people who download the latest Koala will think they are getting the "LaTeSt" version.
Title for the board Kubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron has been 'corrected.'
Thank you.
Windows no longer obstructs my view.
Using Kubuntu Linux since March 23, 2007.
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." - Sherlock Holmes
I believe the kubuntu gods decided to defer the next kubuntu LTS until kde4.x.x is as stable as kde3.x.x was (is).
I'm pretty sure the next ubuntu LTS release will also be a kubuntu LTS release, possibly 10.04 (if they keep the 2 year intervals between LTS releases)
I didn't change the board title without checking first.
Windows no longer obstructs my view.
Using Kubuntu Linux since March 23, 2007.
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." - Sherlock Holmes
Ahh. Well, then I guess the title gets to be changed back.
Thanks kubicle!
Windows no longer obstructs my view.
Using Kubuntu Linux since March 23, 2007.
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." - Sherlock Holmes
Stop confusing the issue. As I read the OP, this thread concerns whether or not Kubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron is the latest release of Kubuntu. How can say that it is unless you do not consider Intrepid and Jaunty to be releases?
The issue of whether or not Kubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron is an official LTS is seperate. The fact that I have never had clarity on this is very annoying, and thus I say that official LTS releases should always be clearly marked as such. It makes a huge difference to me and anyone else who does not want the bleeding edge (like Intrepid) releases for their main computer.
It isn't very clear, and that is Canonical's fault; the Kubuntu team had no input on this issue whatsoever.
To clarify, if it is possible: the Kubuntu bits are not long term support - and long term support only means security fixes, nothing else. Nothing about bug fixes, etc
but the non-kde bits, the kernel, drivers, xorg, etc are LTS
Comment