Basic question - with Windows I could make my own decision (with the help of a magazine review, maybe) on whether to upgrade to the new Vista or whatever.
With Kubuntu - now converted! - I notice on the magazine shelves new flavours of Linux all the time. Do I understand that the underneath Linux stays the same, or are different versions really quite different?
Surely people aren't just switching operating systrems for the hell of it? I know geeks will - but the rest of us ordinary souls?
Once with Kubuntu (as someone who just wants to get on with day to day computing) I should stick with it, right? Faffing around with SUSE, Ubuntu etc is a no-no having made my decision to go with Kubuntu? Assuming that I don't want to roll my sleeves up and get all oily - it's bad enough dealing with Kubuntu's secrets!
With Kubuntu - now converted! - I notice on the magazine shelves new flavours of Linux all the time. Do I understand that the underneath Linux stays the same, or are different versions really quite different?
Surely people aren't just switching operating systrems for the hell of it? I know geeks will - but the rest of us ordinary souls?
Once with Kubuntu (as someone who just wants to get on with day to day computing) I should stick with it, right? Faffing around with SUSE, Ubuntu etc is a no-no having made my decision to go with Kubuntu? Assuming that I don't want to roll my sleeves up and get all oily - it's bad enough dealing with Kubuntu's secrets!



So - flogging a dead horse here I feel...are all these linuxes essentially the same underneath. Different flavours being simply like different flavours of ice-cream? Like different themes? Basically the same? Interchangeable?
. Biggest difference is what desktop you are using (kde/gnome/xfce/...).
. Usually problems arise when your distribution bits and pieces are older than needed. When you try to install program manager tells that Depends: kdelibs4c2a (>= 4:3.5.2) but you have 3.5.0 (or something like that). Then you get newer version (upgrade). 
Comment