I think one of the most important part of the project timelord is a clear definition of what Kubuntu is, where it stands relative to Ubuntu and relative to other distros.
For example: Ubuntu is "linux for human being". This short sentence summarizes many of the project goals: ease to use, simple, intuitive. Hence, for example, the choice of Gnome over KDE.
What about Kubuntu? Few thoughts:
-Kde is more about choice and customization than Gnome. So, it seems more natural to me for Kubuntu to target a more experienced user than than someone switching to linux for the first time.
-Even if Canonical puts more resources into Kubuntu and more volunteers join in, it is still going to be the case that Ubuntu will have more testers/developers that Kubuntu. Again, this means that the average user should expect things not to work right out of the box more often in Kubuntu than in Ubuntu.
-If we really resolve the browser issue and the new Akonadi framework starts bearing fruits, it will be possible to use 100% kde apps for 90% of the tasks. This implies greater integration and consistency than Ubuntu (since it uses Firefox and most people use Thunderbird instead than Evolution).
Therefore:
-with respect to other Distro, Kubuntu is easy to install: no need to mess around for hardware recognition and so on.
-with respect to Ubuntu, Kubuntu offers more choice and at the same time more consistency.
The natural audience for the project is someone that love to spend time changing all the system settings until his desktop really look the way he likes, but he hates having to waste time figuring out how to have a piece of hardware recognized.
Finally, here is my proposition "Kubuntu: be you, be cool"
(well, this may not be exactly a piece of art, and, to be honest, I'm not even a native english speaker, but you get the idea)
For example: Ubuntu is "linux for human being". This short sentence summarizes many of the project goals: ease to use, simple, intuitive. Hence, for example, the choice of Gnome over KDE.
What about Kubuntu? Few thoughts:
-Kde is more about choice and customization than Gnome. So, it seems more natural to me for Kubuntu to target a more experienced user than than someone switching to linux for the first time.
-Even if Canonical puts more resources into Kubuntu and more volunteers join in, it is still going to be the case that Ubuntu will have more testers/developers that Kubuntu. Again, this means that the average user should expect things not to work right out of the box more often in Kubuntu than in Ubuntu.
-If we really resolve the browser issue and the new Akonadi framework starts bearing fruits, it will be possible to use 100% kde apps for 90% of the tasks. This implies greater integration and consistency than Ubuntu (since it uses Firefox and most people use Thunderbird instead than Evolution).
Therefore:
-with respect to other Distro, Kubuntu is easy to install: no need to mess around for hardware recognition and so on.
-with respect to Ubuntu, Kubuntu offers more choice and at the same time more consistency.
The natural audience for the project is someone that love to spend time changing all the system settings until his desktop really look the way he likes, but he hates having to waste time figuring out how to have a piece of hardware recognized.
Finally, here is my proposition "Kubuntu: be you, be cool"
(well, this may not be exactly a piece of art, and, to be honest, I'm not even a native english speaker, but you get the idea)
Comment