Originally posted by dequire
View Post
IMO one of the strengths of Ubuntu is that you can get releases that are well supported and fairly up to date. In my limited experience with other distros (er, pretty much debian stable and Red Hat) it's a huge show-stopping pain to strike a bug or misfeature that has been fixed but to get the fix means upgrading lots of dependencies to later versions, or other gymnastics. Many, or rather most, *buntu users don't appreciate the trouble they've avoided.
For me over the years, there's been a variety of packages that I've needed up to date versions, for disparate and unpredictable purposes, usually related to development or hardware. The LTS proponents will say "you can use backports" (backports are repos that port newer versions back to older releases) but I had trouble finding what I needed once, I can't remember what it was, maybe it was too obscure.
The six month release cadence falls short sometimes, but a ppa or two can tide one over, usually somebody somewhere has found an answer. I think that release cadence was too slow for some KDE people and this led to Neon.
So Neon is good for the latest and greatest KDE, and Kubuntu better for other stuff.
Comment