If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You will have to register
before you can post. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Please do not use the CODE tag when pasting content that contains formatting (colored, bold, underline, italic, etc).
The CODE tag displays all content as plain text, including the formatting tags, making it difficult to read.
Yes. XBMC is so much better that a comparison is just a waste of words. I like the idea but I do think its wasteful of developer time. Nonetheless, the developers do us a favour and are free to work on whichever projects they wish to.
Things that stand out for me about PMC: Ugly, Clunky, no clear add-on system, work in progress. Obviously the work in porgress nature is a direct result of it being such a young project but I just don't see a need for it going forward.
I tried to install it but I never got the dependencies right, and didn't make a real effort in solving it, this was prior to this release.
I understand what you point at dmeyer, and I agree with you. Somehow I think that PMC aim is to be incorporated into plasma-active which makes more sense. I'm not sure XBMC could be scaled for that purpose.
b.r
Jonas
ASUS M4A87TD | AMD Ph II x6 | 12 GB ram | MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti (448 Cuda cores) Kubuntu 12.04 KDE 4.9.x (x86_64) - Debian "Squeeze" KDE 4.(5x) (x86_64) Acer TimelineX 4820 TG | intel i3 | 4 GB ram| ATI Radeon HD 5600 Kubuntu 12.10 KDE 4.10 (x86_64) - OpenSUSE 12.3 KDE 4.10 (x86_64) - Officially free from windoze since 11 dec 2009
>>>>>>>>>>>> Support KFN <<<<<<<<<<<<<
Comment