From the day I bought my Sony VAIO desktop, on Dec 29, 1997, I had nothing but crashes, crashes, crashes. Sony even had an intermediate layer between the hardware and Win95 called the "Sony Medikit", IIRC. It was supposed to intercept a crash and do a graceful recovery. Most of the time it failed and a cold boot was necessary. I reinstalled Win95 FIVE times in those four months. I went to Barnes & Nobel to buy a new copy of OS/2. which I was using on my previous machine, and which ran faultlessly. While there I saw a book titled "Learn Linux in 24 Hours", which included a free copy of RH 5.0 on a CD on the back cover. On May 1, 1998, I replaced the Win95 OS on my Sony VAIO desktop with Red Hat 5.0. My Sony running RH 5.0 NEVER crashed once from May 1, 1998 until I replaced it with SuSE 5.3 in September of 1998.
Why did I switch to SuSE 5.3? RH, as most Linux distros did in that day, used the TWM, a windows manager which interfaced to the xserver. One ran programs whose names began with "x" and created "windows", which indicated it was to run on an xserver window manager. TWM, FVWN, etc ... (IIRC, there were about two dozen flavors of them) all looked similar, ran similar, and were very limited. Switching several times per day between Win95 or some TWM desktop created mental dissonance. SuSE 5.3 was the first distro to offer a new desktop: KDE 1.0 alpha. It was a beauty, and had the look and feel of Win95, but prettier. And it was as easy to use as Win95. AND, neither it or SuSE ever crashed.
Now, running Kubuntu 18.04, I am using KDE Plasma version 5.12.9, KDE Frameworks version 5.44.0, Qt version 5.9.5 on a 4.15.0-72-generic 64bit kernel. IMO, it is the best, most powerful and beautiful desktop on the planet, and it has never crashed on me. (Neither did 16.04, 14.04, 12.04 or 9.04). Oh, I've had a handful of crashes since I began using Kubuntu over the last 10 years, but the fault wasn't with Kubuntu. Lightening strikes, hardware failure, fumble fingers, experiments gone wrong, etc.... KDE Neon ran on this machine between 14 and 16 for about a year and it, too, ran faultlessly.
Anyway, enough of the trip down my memory lane. Here is the article which triggered this post:
https://opensource.com/article/19/8/...-desktop-grown
Why did I switch to SuSE 5.3? RH, as most Linux distros did in that day, used the TWM, a windows manager which interfaced to the xserver. One ran programs whose names began with "x" and created "windows", which indicated it was to run on an xserver window manager. TWM, FVWN, etc ... (IIRC, there were about two dozen flavors of them) all looked similar, ran similar, and were very limited. Switching several times per day between Win95 or some TWM desktop created mental dissonance. SuSE 5.3 was the first distro to offer a new desktop: KDE 1.0 alpha. It was a beauty, and had the look and feel of Win95, but prettier. And it was as easy to use as Win95. AND, neither it or SuSE ever crashed.
Now, running Kubuntu 18.04, I am using KDE Plasma version 5.12.9, KDE Frameworks version 5.44.0, Qt version 5.9.5 on a 4.15.0-72-generic 64bit kernel. IMO, it is the best, most powerful and beautiful desktop on the planet, and it has never crashed on me. (Neither did 16.04, 14.04, 12.04 or 9.04). Oh, I've had a handful of crashes since I began using Kubuntu over the last 10 years, but the fault wasn't with Kubuntu. Lightening strikes, hardware failure, fumble fingers, experiments gone wrong, etc.... KDE Neon ran on this machine between 14 and 16 for about a year and it, too, ran faultlessly.
Anyway, enough of the trip down my memory lane. Here is the article which triggered this post:
https://opensource.com/article/19/8/...-desktop-grown
Comment