I've been running opensuse tw and on another machine opensuse leap for best part of a year and not had any problems on either. I don't know whether I have a "production system" though 
-
-
That is what I call a system one uses e.g. between 9:00 and 18.00, Monday to Friday, to earn one's livelihood or that is used in an industrial setting.
I don't know if it is the right English term for this, sorry.
PS: openSUSE Leap I would use for such a purpose, like Kubuntu LTS or Debian stable.Debian KDE & LXQt • Kubuntu & Lubuntu • openSUSE KDE • Windows • macOS X
Desktop: Lenovo ThinkCentre M75s • Laptop: Apple MacBook Pro 13" • and others
get rid of Snap script (20.04 +) • reinstall Snap for release-upgrade script (20.04 +)
install traditional Firefox script (22.04 +) • install traditional Thunderbird script (24.04)Comment
-
Basically, a PC you use and depend on, as opposed to a PC you just tinker with.Originally posted by Bings View PostWindows no longer obstructs my view.
Using Kubuntu Linux since March 23, 2007.
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." - Sherlock HolmesComment
-
Am I correct in thinking that the recent liblzma compromise indicates a weakness in the rolling release approach? Those on supported *buntu releases were not affected.Regards, John LittleComment
-
Absolutely! One of many reasons I would nearly never ever use a rolling release on a server…Debian KDE & LXQt • Kubuntu & Lubuntu • openSUSE KDE • Windows • macOS X
Desktop: Lenovo ThinkCentre M75s • Laptop: Apple MacBook Pro 13" • and others
get rid of Snap script (20.04 +) • reinstall Snap for release-upgrade script (20.04 +)
install traditional Firefox script (22.04 +) • install traditional Thunderbird script (24.04)Comment
-
No, not really. At least not this one.Originally posted by jlittle View Post
This thing was discovered almost by accident, so if it had been missed, it would be everywhere, even Debian.
But apparently this backdoor doesn't affect Arch
https://archlinux.org/news/the-xz-pa...en-backdoored/
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=294429
As I take it, the tarball was compromised, not the source git repository, and Arch (and Nix, Gentoo, and others) pull it directly from there. The malware is apparently only built from that tarball when using cmake (which isn't used for this on Arch), and only when building rpm/deb packages.Comment
-
OT: Why would it be in Debian stable? Debian testing/unstable/experimental OK, but stable?
Officially the others are not meant for the "normal" user or "normal" usage at all AFAIK.
And at least unstable and experimental are rolling releases (and testing, too), or am I wrong?Debian KDE & LXQt • Kubuntu & Lubuntu • openSUSE KDE • Windows • macOS X
Desktop: Lenovo ThinkCentre M75s • Laptop: Apple MacBook Pro 13" • and others
get rid of Snap script (20.04 +) • reinstall Snap for release-upgrade script (20.04 +)
install traditional Firefox script (22.04 +) • install traditional Thunderbird script (24.04)Comment
-
Well, eventually it would, if the malware hadn't been noticed.Originally posted by Schwarzer Kater View PostComment
-
OT: Fair enough, but so could be any other malware etc. in any other Linux distribution or other OS with a fixed release cycle…Debian KDE & LXQt • Kubuntu & Lubuntu • openSUSE KDE • Windows • macOS X
Desktop: Lenovo ThinkCentre M75s • Laptop: Apple MacBook Pro 13" • and others
get rid of Snap script (20.04 +) • reinstall Snap for release-upgrade script (20.04 +)
install traditional Firefox script (22.04 +) • install traditional Thunderbird script (24.04)Comment
Comment