Warning: This is statistics (remember: third category of lies) and it attempts to present future problems with the current kernel development process. I'm NOT saying these are lies, but it may be an answer in search of a problem.
I'm NOT qualified to judge whether this is a real problem being presented by the author.
I AM saying keep on eye on this because the process is certainly getting more complex. Particularly with the continual flow of new hardware/software/apps on top of the need to maintain code for existing hardware/software/apps.
http://blog.ffwll.ch/2018/04/maintainer-statistics.html
If I have interpreted this correctly, there is a two tier system used to move "kernel contributions" through the system. One tier can only submit, the other must agree to review and possibly commit the code for kernel inclusion. Therein lies a bottleneck due to lack of people able to move the system along.
I could be misinterpreting what the author is saying...
FYI
I'm NOT qualified to judge whether this is a real problem being presented by the author.
I AM saying keep on eye on this because the process is certainly getting more complex. Particularly with the continual flow of new hardware/software/apps on top of the need to maintain code for existing hardware/software/apps.
http://blog.ffwll.ch/2018/04/maintainer-statistics.html
If I have interpreted this correctly, there is a two tier system used to move "kernel contributions" through the system. One tier can only submit, the other must agree to review and possibly commit the code for kernel inclusion. Therein lies a bottleneck due to lack of people able to move the system along.
I could be misinterpreting what the author is saying...
FYI
Comment