The story is a year old but I don't remember reading about it last summer. Do you?
It is now owned by a Chinese company with a shady reputation.
http://gbtimes.com/business/new-chin...era-browser-ai
They plan to use "AI" and their purchase also includes Opera's privacy features and VPN features. Talk about letting the Fox guard the henhouse.
Incredulously, the US was "worried" about the security implicationsof the Chinese purchase. This concern caused the Norway firm to sell only part of the company's assets to the Chinese firm.
Kim Komando notes:
Last summer I reviewed both IPFS and ZeroNet and dismissed them both because they still use ISPs which the government controls and their "Distributed Web" could be cut off at the knees at any time. They also depend on DNS. And, equally important, I didn't have the disk space or bandwidth to be an effective node. Now I do. IPFS has created a static copy of Wikipedia for Turkey but it is not dynamic. Since my last review IPFS and ZeroNet are working on ways of establishing dynamic social websites that are distributed through several nodes.
It is now owned by a Chinese company with a shady reputation.
http://gbtimes.com/business/new-chin...era-browser-ai
They plan to use "AI" and their purchase also includes Opera's privacy features and VPN features. Talk about letting the Fox guard the henhouse.
Incredulously, the US was "worried" about the security implicationsof the Chinese purchase. This concern caused the Norway firm to sell only part of the company's assets to the Chinese firm.
Kim Komando notes:
The two parties re-worked the deal and cut the price in half to an amount equaling $600 million. The new agreement gives the Chinese group Opera's mobile and desktop browsers along with their privacy and performance apps but doesn't include Opera's lucrative advertising, gaming and television platforms.
Would you feel safe and secure surfing the web on a browser owned by the Chinese?
Would you feel safe and secure surfing the web on a browser owned by the Chinese?
Comment