Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mint KDE -- Why not?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Mint KDE -- Why not?

    Linux Mint 17.1 KDE "Rebecca"


    What can I say? It just works. I believe Kubuntu will survive quite well, one way or another. I plan on staying here with Kubuntu. But for those of you who would want a counter to the more adventurous Debian (covered in another thread), relax and rest assured, there's always Mint.

    The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.
    Linux Mint is the most popular desktop Linux distribution and the 3rd most widely used home operating system behind Microsoft Windows and Apple Mac OS.
    Some of the reasons for the success of Linux Mint are:
    • It works out of the box, with full multimedia support and is extremely easy to use.
    • It's both free of cost and open source.
    • It's community-driven. Users are encouraged to send feedback to the project so that their ideas can be used to improve Linux Mint.
    • Based on Debian and Ubuntu, it provides about 30,000 packages and one of the best software managers.
    • It's safe and reliable. Thanks to a conservative approach to software updates, a unique Update Manager and the robustness of its Linux architecture, Linux Mint requires very little maintenance (no regressions, no antivirus, no anti-spyware...etc).
    Linux Mint, home page: http://linuxmint.com/

    Linux Mint is an Ubuntu-based distribution whose goal is to provide a more complete out-of-the-box experience by including browser plugins, media codecs, support for DVD playback, Java and other components. It also adds a custom desktop and menus, several unique configuration tools, and a web-based package installation interface. Linux Mint is compatible with Ubuntu software repositories.
    http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=mint

    2. Mint's own desktop environment comes in the two major flavours Cinnamon and Mate, and in the minor flavours KDE and Xfce. Cinnamon is the most advanced and modern desktop of Mint, and is rightly considered to be its flagship. It's easy to use, yet fast, sophisticated and slick ... KDE: the KDE edition is of interest to advanced users, who like tons of configuration options in the menus..
    How about that! We--Kubuntu--are seen as being someone's "advanced" option! See:
    Linux Mint: what it is and how to select the right flavour for you
    https://sites.google.com/site/easylinuxtipsproject/mint

    ------------------------

    And there is a Mint Debian version.
    Mint Debian, notes:
    The future of Linux Mint Debian Edition and its derivatives
    With Linux Mint Debian Edition set to switch from Debian Testing to Stable, what does this mean for its future?
    http://www.zdnet.com/article/the-fut...d-derivatives/

    Linux Mint Debian Edition: not for beginners and not for production machines
    https://sites.google.com/site/easyli...ction-machines

    ------------------------

    Mint has a new release strategy, basing its releases on the current Ubuntu LTS, not on the 6-month releases:

    And while Linux Mint 17.1 arrives as it usually does (a few weeks after the release of a new version of Ubuntu), version 17.1 is not based on Ubuntu's latest effort, 14.10. Instead, this edition of Mint remains tied to the last Long Term Support (LTS) release, Ubuntu 14.04.
    Linux Mint 17.1 review--less change is good change
    Now relying on an Ubuntu LTS base, Mint update shows the distro's strategy is on point.
    http://arstechnica.com/information-t...s-good-change/

    ------------------------

    Screenshot of Mint KDE (third shot down, the welcome screen is the 7th shot down):
    http://www.linuxmint.com/screenshots.php

    Releases (Mint KDE is only at 17.1):
    http://www.linuxmint.com/oldreleases.php
    Rebecca:
    http://www.linuxmint.com/release.php?id=23

    Interesting reviews:

    Mint 17: The best Linux desktop to date
    I've used hundreds of Linux desktops over the years, and Mint 17 with Cinnamon is my favorite one to date.
    http://www.zdnet.com/article/mint-17...sktop-to-date/
    Note the LTS: 2019

    Mint 17 is the perfect place for Linux-ers to wait out Ubuntu uncertainty
    http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/...uncertainty/1/

    //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

    Linux Mint KDE

    My experience so far: Nothing much remarkable, very similar to a Kubuntu installation, everything went well, Mint KDE is very nice, and here's some brief notes including UEFI considerations.

    Using GParted, I made a 50 GB ext4 partition at sda8 for a test run of Mint (/ and /home).
    Downloaded linuxmint-17.1-kde-64bit ,
    used k3b to burn it to DVD (1.6 GB), re-booted, pressed F2 to enter my PC's UEFI firmware setup, saw the boot option labeled something like "UEFI TSSP [my DVD drive etc.]," selected that to boot, chose "Start Linux Mint 17.1 64-bit," (interestingly, it also offered "Start Linux Mint 17.1 64-bit (compatibility mode)" -- for non-UEFI-mode booting), finally got the Linux Mint KDE screen, very nice, clicked Install Linux Mint, then:

    Installation type: I selected Manual
    Prepare partitions screen: I selected the sda8 I created earlier using GParted
    Device for bootloader: I left it at sda -- it won't matter what you select here since this is a UEFI installation, the installer and GRUB will see my ESP (at sda1) and use it.
    It did ask to format sda8, I said No (since I already did everything using GParted).
    It asked to format my existing swap partition (already made for Kubuntu): I said OK.
    It then installed.
    Installation complete.
    One small hang-up: It ejected the installer DVD, but the screen froze with some white-on-black text messages (ModemManager is shut down), journaling the re-boot process; after awhile, I simply hit the re-boot button on my PC to re-boot. No problem.

    Upon re-booting, Mint's GRUB boot menu appeared. Mint's GRUB took over the booting of the PC, where previously the booting was controlled by the GRUB in Kubuntu 14.04 (my preferred OS).
    All my OSs were listed on the Mint GRUB boot menu, from which I chose to boot into Mint.

    Typed Name and PW, getting to the Welcome Screen at the Mint Desktop.
    13 links on the Welcome Screen, including New Features, User's Guide, Tutorials, Hardware database, Software manager, Mint forums, Idea pools, and Sponsors. I tried some, and they worked. The Welcome Screen is an app listed in the start menu (the bottom-left button on the screen > System).

    => Basically, since it is KDE, and being used to Kubuntu, I was familiar with almost everything in Mint KDE and could immediately start using it, configuring as necessary, including Skype and Kaffeine -- no problems.

    I installed inxi using the package manager Synaptic. Then ran it:
    Code:
    inxi -Fxxx
     System:    Host: mike-All-Series [B]Kernel[/B]: 3.13.0-37-generic x86_64 (64 bit, gcc: 4.8.2)  
     Desktop: [B]KDE 4.14.2[/B] (Qt 4.8.6) Distro: [B]Linux Mint 17.1 Rebecca[/B]
    Check the Booting:

    Code:
    sudo efibootmgr
     BootCurrent: 0000
     Timeout: 1 seconds
     BootOrder: 0000,0003,0001,0005,0006,0002,0007
     Boot0000* ubuntu  [COLOR=#ff3333][B]<-- This is now Mint, over-writing my preferred Kubuntu 14.04[/B][/COLOR]
     Boot0001* debian
     Boot0002* grub_sda5K1504
     Boot0003* rEFInd Boot Manager
     Boot0005* Hard Drive 
     Boot0006* CD/DVD Drive  
     Boot0007* ubuntu [COLOR=#ff3333][B]<-- also for Mint[/B][/COLOR]
     Boot0008* CD/DVD Drive
    The first ubuntu listed is for this:
    File(\EFI\UBUNTU\SHIMX64.EFI)
    The second ubuntu listed is for this:
    File(\EFI\UBUNTU\GRUBX64.EFI)
    As explained here:
    http://askubuntu.com/questions/34236...64-and-shimx64
    the shimx64.efi calls the grubx64.efi
    (has to do with getting past the Secure Boot thing). They both apply to the newly installed Mint, not to my preferred OS Kubuntu 14.04 (whose GRUB 2 EFI boot files got overwritten by Mint's GRUB).
    Both those ubuntu entries pointed to by efibootmgr are in the ESP (=sda1), as you could see if you were to run sudo efibootmgr -v for more details and inspect the GUIDs.

    /usr/lib/grub contains what it should for UEFI:
    Code:
     ls -l /usr/lib/grub
     lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    34 May 13 12:34 grub-mkconfig_lib -> ../../share/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib
     drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 12288 Jul  6 12:00 x86_64-efi
     drwxr-xr-x 2 root root  4096 Jul  6 12:00 x86_64-efi-signed

    And the ESP ( = sda1) for ubuntu (Mint) is ok -- these boot files were placed in the ESP (= sda1) by Mint's GRUB 2-EFI:
    Code:
     ls -l /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu
     total 3416
     -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root     126 Jul  6  2015 grub.cfg
     -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  956792 Jul  6  2015 grubx64.efi
     -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1178240 Jul  6  2015 MokManager.efi
     -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1355736 Jul  6  2015 shimx64.efi

    To fix the BootOrder so the GRUB from my preferred OS, Kubuntu 14.04, controls the booting and is first in BootOrder:

    Boot into Kubuntu 14.04, and do:
    Code:
     [B]sudo grub-install[/B]
     Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
     Installation finished. No error reported.
     [B]sudo update-grub[/B]
     Generating grub configuration file ...
     Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-55-generic
     Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-55-generic
     Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-53-generic
     Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-53-generic
     Found Ubuntu 15.04 (15.04) on /dev/sda5
     Found [COLOR=#ff3333][B]Linux Mint 17.1[/B][/COLOR] Rebecca (17.1) on /dev/sda8
     Found Debian GNU/Linux (8.1) on /dev/sda9
     Adding boot menu entry for EFI firmware configuration
     done
    Now when I run efibootmgr, it looks the same as above, but means something different:
    Code:
    sudo efibootmgr
     BootCurrent: 0000
     Timeout: 1 seconds
     BootOrder: 0000,0003,0001,0005,0006,0002,0007
     Boot0000* ubuntu  [COLOR=#ff3333][B]<-- This is now [/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#ff3333][B]the GRUB boot files from [/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#ff3333][B]Kubuntu 14.04[/B][/COLOR]
     Boot0001* debian
     Boot0002* grub_sda5K1504
     Boot0003* rEFInd Boot Manager
     Boot0005* Hard Drive 
     Boot0006* CD/DVD Drive  
     Boot0007* ubuntu [COLOR=#ff3333][B]<-- also for [/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#ff3333][B]Kubuntu 14.04[/B][/COLOR]
     Boot0008* CD/DVD Drive
    The reason is:
    Thus far, for UEFI setups, there is only one standard directory for Ubuntu and its derivatives. It is this:
    /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu (recall that the ESP (= sda1 in my case) is mounted at /boot/efi (in the Kubuntu filesystem)).
    There is not a special directory for Kubuntu 14.04, or for Kubuntu 15.04, or for Mint, or for Xubuntu, etc. There is only the one ESP directory for all (K)Ubuntu's: /EFI/ubuntu.
    The GRUB 2-EFI from the last Ubuntu distribution you install will overwrite whatever is in /EFI/ubuntu with its own boot files (for the newly installed OS). (Mint is a Ubuntu derivative, and so all this applies to Mint.)


    For UEFI, Kubuntu, and GRUB2-EFI, see my how-to:
    UEFI for Kubuntu -- simplified
    https://www.kubuntuforums.net/showth...l=1#post373198


    \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\


    Summary impressions of Mint KDE, so far

    No surprises, not much to complain about or to report, Mint KDE just works and comes with lots of installed software and codecs already installed and more software that you can install using the CLI or using Synaptic. Installation and use go fairly smooth, relaxing, with no major hurdles. If you are used to Kubuntu and KDE, getting used to Mint KDE should be easy.
    Last edited by Qqmike; Jul 07, 2015, 08:57 AM.
    An intellectual says a simple thing in a hard way. An artist says a hard thing in a simple way. Charles Bukowski

    #2
    thanks for that i didn’t realise that mint did a KDE version ...
    Hope this helps. Steve ...
    Nothing travels faster than the speed of light, except bad news.
    Shuttle XS35 - Intel Atom 1.6 - 4GB Ram - 500GB HDD - Linux Kubuntu

    Comment


      #3
      Note that this time, it is offered in 17.1 not yet in 17.2 -- should make no difference as far as I can see.
      An intellectual says a simple thing in a hard way. An artist says a hard thing in a simple way. Charles Bukowski

      Comment


        #4
        Extremely well written write up! Thanks Mike! I think I'll download Mint KDE and see what's up (for a secondary OS on my laptop).
        Windows no longer obstructs my view.
        Using Kubuntu Linux since March 23, 2007.
        "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." - Sherlock Holmes

        Comment


          #5
          Thanks.
          An intellectual says a simple thing in a hard way. An artist says a hard thing in a simple way. Charles Bukowski

          Comment


            #6
            Nice write up Mike!

            When I investigated Mint KDE I noticed that it was not featured on the home page, nor were there any links to a "KDE Project" on any submenus. The only way to get to KDE is to go to the download menu, choose the "all versions", then select "17.1" link. On that download page are the two downloadable KDE versions listed. I could not find any other mentions of KDE except on tthe snapshots.
            Obviously, a KDE distro is not Mint's first, second or third line distro. It is the red-headed step child of a red-headed step-child.

            I read that Mint will be discontinuing the LMDE version because it is redundant with a Debian release.

            Neither the Cinnamon nor the MATE version interest me.
            Pragmatically, Linux Mint, by being based off of Ubuntu, is in the same boat that Kubuntu is in, surviving on the tender mercies of the SABDFL. I believe that what ever happens to Kubuntu will happen to Mint as well. That is what led me to consider JessieKDE.
            "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
            – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by GreyGeek View Post
              Pragmatically, Linux Mint, by being based off of Ubuntu, is in the same boat that Kubuntu is in, surviving on the tender mercies of the SABDFL. I believe that what ever happens to Kubuntu will happen to Mint as well. That is what led me to consider JessieKDE.

              No, not exactly. Mint utilizes Ubuntu and Debian, if I understand correctly.
              Windows no longer obstructs my view.
              Using Kubuntu Linux since March 23, 2007.
              "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." - Sherlock Holmes

              Comment


                #8
                I have one issue with mint. It's a small one and is easy to fix... It defaults to yahoo search.
                It was enough for me to skip it


                Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

                Comment


                  #9
                  Reading articles and reviews, I get the feeling that Mint is aware of its dependence on Ubuntu and is trying to position away.

                  Maybe we need to go over there and voice some support for their KDE!
                  An intellectual says a simple thing in a hard way. An artist says a hard thing in a simple way. Charles Bukowski

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Just to note as, Mint KDE's KDE stuff is pure Kubuntu packaging, so for all intents and purposes, it basically is Kubuntu, with a different theme and package manager.


                    Heck, if you look at some of the debian based KDE distros, they are at least basing off of our packages.

                    Which of course I find very cool.

                    Sent from my LG G4

                    Comment


                      #11
                      claydoh: Just to note as, Mint KDE's KDE stuff is pure Kubuntu packaging, so for all intents and purposes, it basically is Kubuntu, with a different theme and package manager.
                      No wonder this test was so easy
                      An intellectual says a simple thing in a hard way. An artist says a hard thing in a simple way. Charles Bukowski

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Snowhog View Post
                        [/CENTER]No, not exactly. Mint utilizes Ubuntu and Debian, if I understand correctly.
                        From its About page:
                        • Based on Debian and Ubuntu, it provides about 30,000 packages and one of the best software managers.

                        I suspect that the Debian part relates to Linux Mint Debian Edition (LMDE).
                        "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
                        – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I agree with the OP that Mint does a great job.

                          And was a little surprised some were not aware of it's dependency on Ubuntu, if Canonical would decide to pull Kubuntu's plug so will Mint go down.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Of course, as we know, Mint is REALLY known for Cinnamon. I suspect, as claydoh says, that a lot of people and packages depend upon Kubuntu doing its go[o]dly duty.
                            An intellectual says a simple thing in a hard way. An artist says a hard thing in a simple way. Charles Bukowski

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I was curious about how Linux Mint has improved since I last tried it several years ago. Then, KDE was a featured desktop. But, I was really interested in how closely Mint followed Ubuntu's partition schemes. Being an Ubuntu derivative I was stunned when the partition program did not offer Btrfs as a fs. That's a show stopper for me.

                              PS - Not willing to let a fine distro like Linux Mint go to the curb so quickly I rebooted the guest OS but chose the iso instead of the VD. I installed Btrfs-tools and used btrfs-convert.
                              mint@mint:~ > sudo su -
                              mint ~ # vdir /dev/sd*
                              brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 0 Jul 7 22:03 /dev/sda
                              brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 1 Jul 7 22:03 /dev/sda1
                              mint ~ # btrfs-convert /dev/sda1
                              creating btrfs metadata.
                              creating ext2fs image file.
                              cleaning up system chunk.
                              conversion complete.
                              mint ~ #
                              It seemed to have worked. I'm writing this now from the iso. I'll reboot and see what the conversion did in regards to @ and @home.

                              EDIT: When I booted I got a grub rescue screen. That's when I bailed.
                              Last edited by GreyGeek; Jul 07, 2015, 09:14 PM.
                              "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
                              – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X