Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A must read very important news

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    You've helped me out of a lot of bad situations (that I got myself into). I appreciate all you've done -- you will be missed.
    "If you're in a room with another person who sees the world exactly as you do, one of you is redundant." Dr. Steven Covey, The 7-Habits of Highly Effective People

    Comment


      I'm not going anywhere. It doesn't matter what distro I end up using (which for now is Kubuntu 14.04.2) I will always make this my Linux home. it is too good of a forum to leave.(PS - glad I could be of help!)
      "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
      – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

      Comment


        On my side the same, even though I did not participate to that very forum I continue helping people on ubuntu-fr forums and so on.
        Last edited by julek; Jul 25, 2015, 03:40 PM.

        Comment


          The thing with Debian is that so many of the packages are just old. I was chatting with my son yesterday. He's getting into IRC. I told him about Quassel, and how having a Quassel core running on the home server here would allow him to see chat histories. The Quassel in Debian 8 is 0.10 -- which is more than a year old. The current version is 0.12.2, released in May. The Quassel folks aren't even supporting 0.10 anymore, but Debian testing and Debian unstable still contain Quassel 0.10.

          Ubuntu Server 15.04 has Quassel 0.12.2. It's been backported to earlier releases. Seems that if you want a Debian-based server with up-to-date packages, Ubuntu is the only choice. Are there any other Debian-based distros that stay up to date?

          Maybe I'll just put Arch on the server.

          Comment


            Originally posted by SteveRiley View Post
            Are there any other Debian-based distros that stay up to date?
            My conclusion, based on my non-scientific distro experiments, is no there are not any others.

            I certainly don't disagree about your Arch statement.

            Comment


              Interesting that you should mention Arch. I've been thinking about making Arch a guest OS under VB so I could play with it. Heard lots of good stuff about it, and, that it's NOT a distro for noobs. I'm wondering if I'm too old to run it!
              "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
              – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

              Comment


                Based on your posts here, I suspect you will enjoy working your way through the install, and then using it. Be prepared though, you won't install it in 15 minutes like a typical click click through a Ubiquity install.

                Comment


                  Manjaro is based on arch... plasma 5 is working quite well on it, compared to plasma 5 on openSuse maybe. The laptop I am testing with is not the oldest or most current.
                  I am liking it so far for the little bit I have played. One downside with the installer currently is if you want and advanced setup (brtfs) the GUI installer is not an option.
                  Kubuntu 18.04 on AMD

                  Comment


                    i have been runing arch on my laptop for maybe 2 months now . once you set it up its great. the arch wiki is also very helpful
                    Mark Your Solved Issues [SOLVED]
                    (top of thread: thread tools)

                    Comment


                      Interesting installation process. I printed out the installation "guide" and booted the ISO file as a guest OS. I was presented with a root prompt. My first discovery is that the "guide" is worthless. The instructions might as well be written in Chinese. The "install.txt" I found in /root was only slightly more elaborate which made it equally obtuse. It appears to me that the "guide" is really Google search hints, telling you the order of questions you should ask on Google in order to find out what commands you should type, along with switches to do the installation steps. Deb and apt-get I am familiar with but "pacman"? And, according to Sithlord, if I want to use advanced features like Btrfs I can only do so through a terminal command line install because it is not available in their simplistic GUI installer. My only question is "what GUI installer?" That option wasn't presented on the installation boot menu.


                      What would you think if the Kubuntu installer, after going through the graphical installer which allowed you to set country and keyboard, do the partition and formatting and install all the software, dumped you at a terminal login prompt with the instruction "create your account, log into it and install the KDE4 desktop, configure it and then log onto it? How many of you would still be running Kubuntu?
                      Last edited by GreyGeek; Jul 29, 2015, 07:56 PM.
                      "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
                      – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

                      Comment


                        LOL ,,,,this talk reminds me of my first few installs ever ,,,,Slackware ,,,,totally text based no GUI whatsoever ,,,,,,,,,,hours of fun to get to a desktop ,,,with a working computer by my side for tut reading wile doing it ,,,,,,,Muahaha

                        VINNY
                        i7 4core HT 8MB L3 2.9GHz
                        16GB RAM
                        Nvidia GTX 860M 4GB RAM 1152 cuda cores

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by GreyGeek View Post
                          Interesting installation process. I printed out the installation "guide" and booted the ISO file as a guest OS. I was presented with a root prompt. My first discovery is that the "guide" is worthless.
                          Which guide? There are two. The Installation Guide is quite short and is best thought of as a conceptual overview. The Beginner's Guide is far more detailed. I've done probably half a dozen Arch installs on VMs over the years. The Beginner's Guide works perfectly.

                          Originally posted by GreyGeek View Post
                          Deb and apt-get I am familiar with but "pacman"?
                          Pacman: package manager. If there is one thing I could wave my hand and change all across the Linux land, it would be the unnecessary proliferation of package management tools. If only there were, you know, something like a standard.

                          Originally posted by GreyGeek View Post
                          And, according to Sithlord, if I want to use advanced features like Btrfs I can only do so through a terminal command line install because it is not available in their simplistic GUI installer. My only question is "what GUI installer?" That option wasn't presented on the installation boot menu.
                          You're confusing Arch with Manjaro. Manjaro is an Arch-based distribution that eliminates much of the tedium of setting up an Arch system, mostly by way of Manjaro's graphical installer.

                          Comment


                            The guide on the wiki contains the necessary terminal commands at each stage of the install. My photographic memory having failed mr years ago I must either print out the good guide or have a second box running in order to read the guide. You can't install arch without an Internet connection.

                            However, I will solider on because I am interested in seeing what advantages it might have.
                            "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
                            – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by SteveRiley View Post
                              If only there were, you know, something like a standard.
                              https://xkcd.com/927/

                              Comment


                                About testing Linux distributions (Arch) and package managers

                                I think that the easiest way is to use a virtual installation.



                                When you have a working installation you could copy the virtual installation to the hardware.
                                With the Arch, in the testing phase, you could simply copy&paste the commands.


                                The pacman ( https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman ) is a powerful tool from the cli. Those who can't use the cli there are plenty of front ends: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...cman_frontends


                                KDE/Qt



                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X