If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You will have to register
before you can post. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you have copied text output that contains formatting (colors, highlighting, etc.), please do not enclose it in QUOTE or CODE tags. Just right-click your mouse and choose "Paste Without Formatting" or similar (Paste as plain text).
The following Topic Prefixes are designated for use in Community Cafe:
DS (Distribution Showdown)
GN (Geek News)
KLD (Kubuntu or Linux Discussion)
TWC (The Water Cooler)
KUT (Kubuntu User Testimony)
NRD (Next Release Discussion)
While use is not required, doing so allows for efficient Filtering.
@HalationEffect: So what your saying is, if there were only these two operating systems available you would not have a computer.
OK, maybe I was a bit hyperbolic.
I'd enjoy my computing experience a lot less though, regardless of which choice I made - they're both equally unpalatable to me. Wouldn't surprise me if the amount of time I spent using my PC reduced by quite a bit if those were the only choices. I'd probably use the command line a lot more than I currently do (as a ratio) too.
To those people who didn't understand the question.
What if GNU/Linux only had one desktop available (Gnome Shell) and the only alternative was Windows Vista. (If there was no other desktop environment available, no KDE, XFCE LXDE (soon to be replaced by LXQT) etc. And of course Microsoft had still supported Vista and did not bring out 7 or 8.
So, please, non of this "I'd install GNU/Linux and replace it with KDE" because in this scenario KDE does not exist.
To those people who didn't understand the question.
What if GNU/Linux only had one desktop available (Gnome Shell) and the only alternative was Windows Vista. (If there was no other desktop environment available, no KDE, XFCE LXDE (soon to be replaced by LXQT) etc. And of course Microsoft had still supported Vista and did not bring out 7 or 8.
So, please, non of this "I'd install GNU/Linux and replace it with KDE" because in this scenario KDE does not exist.
Now which one would you choose?
KDE. I'd invent it.
Xenix/UNIX user since 1985 | Linux user since 1991 | Was registered Linux user #163544
The poll was simply to find out of the two "worst" desktops which one would you prefer.
Windows Vista is/was hated by a lot of Windows users and Gnome Shell is hated by a lot of GNU/Linux users (especially KDE users) and I just wanted to see if you guys (the KDE users) would use Gnome Shell because of GNU/Linux or if you hated Gnome Shell or GTK that much that you would choose use Vista. That's all.
It isn't a serious poll it was just to satisfy my curiosity.
The poll was simply to find out of the two "worst" desktops which one would you prefer.
Windows Vista is/was hated by a lot of Windows users and Gnome Shell is hated by a lot of GNU/Linux users (especially KDE users) and I just wanted to see if you guys (the KDE users) would use Gnome Shell because of GNU/Linux or if you hated Gnome Shell or GTK that much that you would choose use Vista. That's all.
It isn't a serious poll it was just to satisfy my curiosity.
I'd go back to using Linux from a command line, or I'd just force myself to get used to GNOME. Windows? NEVER!
Xenix/UNIX user since 1985 | Linux user since 1991 | Was registered Linux user #163544
Comment