Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Windows XP Deadline Missed by IRS

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by vinnywright View Post
    this is my point ,,,,,,there should be a record of the taxes being taken out of my check and deposited in the state/Federal acct. that should be assessable to the IRS and state IRS so that pore foke like me that can barley afford gas to get to work dont get squeezed for more money they cant afford to lose

    ths is the rub,,,,,,,pore people dont have the accountants to do this kind of stuff and keep the records ........thay know that hitting a lower income person will probably result in a garnishment ,,,,, and do so ,,,, so more money for the gov.

    the taxes were taken out of my check (as usual) and I was owed a refund ,,,,,,,I just did not file.
    VINNY
    I agree with your arguments, VINNY. It is my POV that the IRS is an abomination, the extent of which has been recently revealed by its use as a political weapon, and that it should be replaced with a graduated national sales tax. The more luxurious the item the higher the tax. Food, basic clothing, medicine and healthcare should be tax exempt. But, this is a discussion we've had on this forum before, so there is little use is chewing that bone again.
    "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
    – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

    Comment


      #17
      Which is why I both believe and understand [re:that it will never happen] that the United States Tax Code, which as of 2013 was 73,954 pages long, should be abolished in it's entirety and replaced with a National Sales Tax, established by U.S. Constitutional Amendment at ten-percent, from which no one is exempted, and which has no ceiling (no matter how little or how much one spends, they pay the 'tax').

      I believe that people should reap what they sow without penalty. I believe that everyone should help pay for the society they live in/helped establish/benefit from. No one should get a 'free ride' if they have the facalties and means to contribute.

      Why won't this ever happen (and yes, I know that it used to be this way; we just won't return to it again)? Because the true nature of the U.S. Tax Code is to enslave citizens; to foreever place a yolk around their necks, placing them into servitued to their 'masters'. We are not 'free' citizens, but rather, bonded and indentured slaves to out Government, and Government likes it that way and won't, in my opinion, ever relinquesh that control willingly. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

      Disclaimer: I live in the glass house I'm throwing stones at, so I have the right to do so.
      Windows no longer obstructs my view.
      Using Kubuntu Linux since March 23, 2007.
      "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." - Sherlock Holmes

      Comment


        #18
        mmm.... Thanks for saying what was on my mind!
        "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
        – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by vinnywright View Post
          I do not still have the W2 ,,,,,,,,,and cant find the old employer .
          Did your employer outsource their payroll to ADP or some similar outfit? If so, you might be able to obtain a W2 from that firm. Just another avenue to explore.

          Comment


            #20
            The incompetent revenue service did something wrong, what a suprise

            Sent from my XT901 using Tapatalk
            Registered Linux User 545823

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by Teunis
              That contract apparently includes a clause they have to 'upgrade' to Win7/Win8.*.

              In other words, pre-programmed and contractual lock-in, another win-win for MS.
              Actually, it is phenomenally expensive for Microsoft to provide custom support for EOLed software. The fees charged are usually more than the price for an upgrade but capture only a small part of the full costs for the support. So mandating an eventual upgrade saves the customer and Microsoft money.

              Comment


                #22
                Was going to make a derisive comment about the amount of political donations and visits to the Oval Office but won't.

                woodgoingtogetbannedyetsmoke

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by woodsmoke View Post
                  Was going to make a derisive comment about the amount of political donations and visits to the Oval Office but won't.
                  Not exactly sure why you even think there's a relationship. Absolutely nothing relating to the cost of custom support or the extended deadlines for contracted upgrades has a (Democratic, Republican, other) political component.

                  If you wish to direct your ire about money influencing politicians, your target must necessarily be our increasingly corporatized Supreme Court and its willful ignorance of the corrupting power of limitless campaign donations.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    I'll just add some fuel to the fire, and walk away whistling innocently:
                    https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/04/14

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by kubicle View Post
                      I'll just add some fuel to the fire, and walk away whistling innocently:
                      https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/04/14
                      The word "elite" appears five times in this article.
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by life0riley View Post
                        The word "elite" appears five times in this article.
                        I think they are using the real meaning of "elite" (someone with lots of money, power or both) rather than the meaning FOX News has forced down the throats of a significant number of people.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by life0riley View Post
                          The word "elite" appears five times in this article.
                          That's somewhat understandable when you're quoting a study titled: "Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens"

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by kubicle View Post
                            I'll just add some fuel to the fire, and walk away whistling innocently:
                            https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/04/14
                            I tend to not finish reading any report which, in its first sentence, redefines a commonly-understood term like "oligarchy" in order to spin up the storyline.

                            @vinnywright -- is it possible that your contractor employer from 2008 failed to actually deposit the witholdings that he took out of your paycheck? If so, and if you have any record of your employment, HE is the one legally responsible to pay the IRS, and they cannot make that YOUR problem. But you do need some evidence of what happened. If you have a pay stub that shows his federal employer ID number, that would be perfect.
                            Last edited by dibl; Apr 16, 2014, 09:06 AM.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by dibl View Post
                              I tend to not finish reading any report which, in its first sentence, redefines a commonly-understood term like "oligarchy" in order to spin up the storyline.
                              Totally understandable view point (somewhat unavoidable in the modern day internet news media circus, though, where you spin a head line that draws attention...and then try to write something that might or might not relate to the head line)

                              But the main point of mine was of course the study, not the article, which I knew was controversial (hence the "fuel and flame" part). Just wanted to post a summary instead of the full study which is clearly "TL,DR".

                              I think we've had a discussion about the "Iron Law of Oligarchy" previously on these forums.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by dibl View Post
                                I tend to not finish reading any report which, in its first sentence, redefines a commonly-understood term like "oligarchy" in order to spin up the storyline.

                                @vinnywright -- is it possible that your contractor employer from 2008 failed to actually deposit the witholdings that he took out of your paycheck? If so, and if you have any record of your employment, HE is the one legally responsible to pay the IRS, and they cannot make that YOUR problem. But you do need some evidence of what happened. If you have a pay stub that shows his federal employer ID number, that would be perfect.
                                I dont see how they redefined oligarchy. From the dictionary: "a form of government in which all power is vested in a few persons or in a dominant class or clique; government by the few." In the article they said "extremely corrupt" and if our democracy has fallen into a state of oligarchy, Id venture to say that our leaders are pretty corrupt.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X