Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canonical + GNOME ?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    Canonical + GNOME ?

    Isn't this...interesting...



    Code:
    steve@t520:~$ [B]dig www.gnome.org[/B]

; <<>> DiG 9.9.3-rpz2+rl.13214.22-P2-Ubuntu-1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu1 <<>> www.gnome.org
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 22254
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 6

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.gnome.org.                 IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.gnome.org.          600     IN      CNAME   socket.gnome.org.
socket.gnome.org.       464     IN      A       91.189.93.3

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
gnome.org.              338     IN      NS      ns-slave.gnome.org.
gnome.org.              338     IN      NS      orgo.progsoc.uts.edu.au.
gnome.org.              338     IN      NS      ns-master.gnome.org.
gnome.org.              338     IN      NS      ns.axu.tm.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns.axu.tm.              84919   IN      A       80.83.7.5
ns.axu.tm.              84919   IN      AAAA    2001:1430:a:35::35
orgo.progsoc.uts.edu.au. 2119   IN      A       138.25.6.2
ns-slave.gnome.org.     80789   IN      A       91.189.93.2
ns-master.gnome.org.    80789   IN      A       209.132.180.181

;; Query time: 236 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.0.110#53(192.168.0.110)
;; WHEN: Sat Dec 28 14:25:01 PST 2013
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 278
    Code:
    steve@t520:~$ [B]whois 91.189.93.3[/B]
...
inetnum:        91.189.88.0 - 91.189.95.255
netname:        CANONICAL-CORE
descr:          Canonical Ltd
country:        GB
org:            ORG-CAN1-RIPE
admin-c:        CAN-RIPE
tech-c:         CAN-RIPE
status:         ASSIGNED PI
mnt-by:         RIPE-NCC-END-MNT
mnt-lower:      RIPE-NCC-END-MNT
mnt-by:         CANONICAL-MNT
mnt-routes:     CANONICAL-MNT
mnt-domains:    CANONICAL-MNT
remarks:        rev-srv:        ns1.canonical.com
remarks:        rev-srv:        ns2.canonical.com
remarks:        rev-srv:        ns3.canonical.com
source:         RIPE # Filtered
remarks:        rev-srv attribute deprecated by RIPE NCC on 02/09/2009

organisation:   ORG-CAN1-RIPE
org-name:       Canonical Ltd
org-type:       OTHER
address:        1 Circular Road
address:        Douglas
address:        Isle of Man
address:        IM1 1AF
address:        United Kingdom
mnt-ref:        CANONICAL-MNT
mnt-by:         CANONICAL-MNT
source:         RIPE # Filtered

role:           Canonical Ltd Admin
address:        1 Circular Road
address:        Douglas
address:        Isle of Man
address:        IM1 1AF
admin-c:        LJ974-RIPE
admin-c:        JT2256-RIPE
admin-c:        NM1806-RIPE
admin-c:        HM129-RIPE
tech-c:         LJ974-RIPE
tech-c:         JT2256-RIPE
tech-c:         NM1806-RIPE
tech-c:         HM129-RIPE
nic-hdl:        CAN-RIPE
mnt-by:         CANONICAL-MNT
source:         RIPE # Filtered

% Information related to '91.189.93.0/24AS41231'

route:          91.189.93.0/24
descr:          Canonical Route Object
origin:         AS41231
mnt-by:         CANONICAL-MNT
source:         RIPE # Filtered
    Tags: None
    • Top
    • Bottom
    #2
    Interesting, it seems to have been hosted there for a few years.

    Also this:
    https://wiki.gnome.org/AdvisoryBoard
    I assume gtk is the important bit that ties them all together?
    • Top
    • Bottom

    Comment

      #3
      Originally posted by claydoh View Post
      https://wiki.gnome.org/AdvisoryBoard
      I assume gtk is the important bit that ties them all together?
      Probably not. Starting with the Ubuntu One client, and now Unity, Canonical is moving toward Qt as its preferred toolkit. Besides being better (*), Qt also has a mobile presence, whereas Gtk+ really doesn't.

      (*) totally unbiased and completely factual opinion
      • Top
      • Bottom

      Comment

        #4
        Ok, change that to "was the important bit".

        Sent from my DNA using Tapatalk, like that really matters
        • Top
        • Bottom

        Comment

          #5
          Originally posted by claydoh View Post
          Ok, change that to "was the important bit".

          Sent from my DNA using Tapatalk, like that really matters
          DNA? You gonna send from your RNA next time?
          The unjust distribution of goods persists, creating a situation of social sin that cries out to Heaven and limits the possibilities of a fuller life for so many of our brothers. -- Archbishop Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires (now Pope Francis)
          • Top
          • Bottom

          Comment

            #6
            Originally posted by bsniadajewski View Post
            send from your RNA
            Isn't that... mRNA?
            • Top
            • Bottom

            Comment

              #7
              They both = 42.
              • Top
              • Bottom

              Comment

                #8
                Yes, but what is the question? LOL
                • Top
                • Bottom

                Comment

                  #9
                  • Top
                  • Bottom

                  Comment

                    #10
                    @SteveRiley Yeah sure. instead of 0's and 1's it's sent in T's C's G's and A's.
                    The unjust distribution of goods persists, creating a situation of social sin that cries out to Heaven and limits the possibilities of a fuller life for so many of our brothers. -- Archbishop Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires (now Pope Francis)
                    • Top
                    • Bottom

                    Comment

                    Previous template Next
                    Working...
                    X