Originally posted by dmeyer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Some speculation about numbers
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by Buddlespit View PostThis isn't a "British" thing. English speaking cultures appear to be slower in changing to a metric system, which is vastly newer than the duodecimal system.
Britain itself was quite metric when I lived there in the 1980s, (I remember having to install a terminal and asking the young woman who'd be using it whether her desk was more than six feet from the nearest socket and getting a blank look until I then said two metres) except for their attachment to miles.
Regards, John LittleRegards, John Little
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
I work in a factory that makes wood drawers ,,,,, and we use both systems of measurement depending on the customer and or application .
in fact most of our blue prints will have both on them
Code:| | | | |<--------------->| | | | | 19.05 mm 0.75 in
i7 4core HT 8MB L3 2.9GHz
16GB RAM
Nvidia GTX 860M 4GB RAM 1152 cuda cores
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by vinnywright View PostI work in a factory that makes wood drawers ,,,,, and we use both systems of measurement depending on the customer and or application .
in fact most of our blue prints will have both on them
Code:| | | | |<--------------->| | | | | 19.05 mm 0.75 in
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by tek_heretik View PostIt would appear by your example they are primarily going by imperial. I too have worked with both and conversion is a pain in the butt.
+our digital caliper's (Micrometer's) do both mm and in
thanks again @woodsmoke it still works swell
VINNYi7 4core HT 8MB L3 2.9GHz
16GB RAM
Nvidia GTX 860M 4GB RAM 1152 cuda cores
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Thank you Vinny!
Tek:
conversion is a pain in the butt.
If the student is immersed in the system then the student gets used to it, although it is not "quite" as "human calibrated" as "english".
And, also, conversions, and lack thereof because of BOTH political parties "cutting back" on NASA, for their own religious agendas, one being agains big gubbmint and one wasting money in space instead of spending it here in the good ol USofA on medical care.....
is why the first mars lander buried itself a few meters/yards under the surface of Mars...
which was covered up and not talked about..
And, curiously, the one thing that students are asked to do on the standardized testing is do....conversions.... duuuhhhh and they get them wrong and the school and teachers are just evil because they failed the student.
I think we ought to throw it all out and go with Babylonian
It has four great advantages.
A) It is written in stone and so therefore will never change.
B) It is "dead" and so there is no way that this national group or that national group can have a "problem" with it.
C) It already provides the unit of "time"....the "metric" units which would have 100 seconds have never caught on.
D) It's pretty!
it's one dis-advantage was that it did not have a "zero" which is kinda important....sooooo
one could turn that to an advantage! Create a whole new branch of mathematicians, and government bureaucrats, and manufacturers......to scaffold a zero onto it...
hey....everybody could get in on the fun!
wood'sgreatlonglostgreat(tobase60)granddadwasachie fcookandbottlewasherforHammurabi'sfirstnephewonhis cousin'sside,secondremovedsmoke
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
The problem with dividing a circle into 360° is that in the time before digital computers it was difficult to do the math when making precise measurements involving degrees, minutes, seconds and even smaller more precise measurements. So in the artillery we invented a new circle measurement which divided it into 6400 equal parts which are referred to as mils. You can quickly see how this greatly simplified doing the complex calculations required to perform accurate fire missions. The use of 6400 mils is the standard for all western armies. However the Russians, and those armies that came under their influence use a circle of 6000 mils.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
I worked for a major corporation that declared in the late 1980's. "We are going metric". I was put on the steering committee. It never happened completely despite sweat and gold being expended. Too many legacy tools and equipment in use as was stated earlier by woodsmoke.Linux because it works. No social or political motives in my decision to use it.
Always consider Occam's Razor
Rich
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Metric measurements are fine except temperature. How are you supposed to know how to dress? Is 29 cold or hot?
In Fahrenheit, it's easy: 50's = coat, 60's = sweater, 70's = shirt sleeves, 80's = short sleeves, 90's = air conditioning.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
I lived in a totally mixed measurement world for my twenty years in the US Army. Everything to do with navigation and firing data and many other things was metric. But Just about anything else was not. This was because it was felt to be very important for us to be compatible with our NATO Allies.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by oshunluvr View PostMetric measurements are fine except temperature. How are you supposed to know how to dress? Is 29 cold or hot?
In Fahrenheit, it's easy: 50's = coat, 60's = sweater, 70's = shirt sleeves, 80's = short sleeves, 90's = air conditioning.Last edited by tek_heretik; Sep 06, 2013, 04:57 AM.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Metrication is a real boon for the building trades here; they measure *everything* linear (well, almost) in "mil", that is millimetres. Doors, baths, plaster board, nails, pipes... I've even seen plans for a house that had the roof line labelled as 6000 mm high. They use the word "metre" to refer to cubic metres, as in, say, a metre of sand. I reckon if the US and Canada could take the plunge they'd never look back.
Regards, John LittleRegards, John Little
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by jlittle View PostMetrication is a real boon for the building trades here; they measure *everything* linear (well, almost) in "mil", that is millimetres. Doors, baths, plaster board, nails, pipes... I've even seen plans for a house that had the roof line labelled as 6000 mm high. They use the word "metre" to refer to cubic metres, as in, say, a metre of sand. I reckon if the US and Canada could take the plunge they'd never look back.
Regards, John LittleLinux because it works. No social or political motives in my decision to use it.
Always consider Occam's Razor
Rich
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
Comment