The most embarrassing thing about being a topologist, yes, is explaining why you don't know geography. Not this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topography But this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_topology. I know you know. If "nested layers of abstraction" turns you on, yes, algebraic topology is one neat place to hang your hat. I liked topology, I liked abstract algebra (that is not the algebra most people think of), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_algebra , so when I saw you could investigate abstract topological spaces using algebraic structures, that was the thing for me.
"Hell is other people." from No Exit, yes I had forgotten that actually. Looks like I've come full circle, from Sartre in college to the drunken Bukowski! "As I'm somewhat of a depressive hermit, no surprise that I'd latch onto that particular line. It really resonates with me." As I say, H-E, you might like Bukowski, his poems are best (vs novels). So many readers have thanked Bukowski for giving them something they could relate to, to hang on to, to help them get through the craziness of modern life, but Bukowski would say, Yes, that's nice, but who the hell am I supposed to read to help ME?!
And as to my Halmos story, this: "... can anyone present a proof I can understand?," as I'm sure you might already surmise, of course Halmos understood my proof but exaggerated with some humor to encourage a naive approach, starting with a solid, basic understanding of what is REALLY going on at the detail level of the spaces involved, rather than to whip out some sexy function-theoretic sledge hammer as I did (but it did impress my fellow students and I think also Dr. Halmos may have raised one eyebrow however slightly).
Halmos had an interesting habit. On the first day of class he said he wanted to know each of us. He asked each person to say his name. Then he scheduled a F2F in his office with each student. He also took a Polaroid or three of the class, marked a sheet of paper with our names (in bijective correspondence with the seating at the photo), and returned to the next class in two days to call us each by name and for the rest of the semester. As he said, that was his "photographic" memory at work. He had a good sense of humor, was friendly, walked everywhere, carrying a walking cane, always wore a hat.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Just how big is it?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
How BIG....BIG....IS...it!? lol
On the last episode of "Suites"...the two "heroine" secretaries were .....talking about a guy...
and one of them held her fingers up and started "spreading the tips of fingers apart".... and after about....
humoungous inches....
walked off.
woodsmokeLast edited by woodsmoke; Aug 01, 2013, 02:18 AM.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qqmike View PostI haven't followed mathematics lately.
HalationEffect: "Paul Halmos is another name with which I'm unfamiliar (but I see from his Wikipedia page that he worked with John von Neumann, who I very much have heard of)."
I also worked with Halmos ... as a struggling graduate student taking his Real Analysis course :-)
I once presented a short, 3-line insightful proof to a complex, delicate theorem by abstracting to a higher-level operator space and using a fixed point property of Hilbert spaces. His response was simple, "Mr Qq, I'm impressed, very clever, too clever, so clever that I can't see what is really going on at the detail level, thank you, please sit down now, and can anyone present a proof I can understand?" He was right, of course, I didn't really understand the theorem at a meaningful level; to me it was just another opportunity to abstract some pure, clean math out of it. (I majored in algebraic topology, if that tells you anything.)
Algebraic topology... I know those words separately, but together, not so much. I took a look at the Wikipedia page on the subject... and wow, I've seen some arcane wiki pages in my time, but that takes the cake! I mean, the page is (allegedly) written in English, but it may as well have been Greek. The only thing I came away from it with was a vague sense that it might tie in with a personal gut-feeling of mine (which doesn't really deserve to be raised to the level of a hypothesis) that all aspects of reality from the quantum foam up, are nested layers of abstraction.
Originally posted by Qqmike View Post"Hell is other people." -- you would like BukowskiAs I'm somewhat of a depressive hermit, no surprise that I'd latch onto that particular line. It really resonates with me.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qqmike View PostI majored in algebraic topology, if that tells you anything.
"Let X be the height of this mountain, and Y be the depth of the valley below. If Alice navigates within 90% of the distance between X and Y, how fast can Bob refold his map?"
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qqmike View Post"Mr Qq, I'm impressed, very clever, too clever, so clever that I can't see what is really going on at the detail level, thank you, please sit down now, and can anyone present a proof I can understand?"
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
-
I haven't followed mathematics lately.
HalationEffect: "Paul Halmos is another name with which I'm unfamiliar (but I see from his Wikipedia page that he worked with John von Neumann, who I very much have heard of)."
I also worked with Halmos ... as a struggling graduate student taking his Real Analysis course :-)
I once presented a short, 3-line insightful proof to a complex, delicate theorem by abstracting to a higher-level operator space and using a fixed point property of Hilbert spaces. His response was simple, "Mr Qq, I'm impressed, very clever, too clever, so clever that I can't see what is really going on at the detail level, thank you, please sit down now, and can anyone present a proof I can understand?" He was right, of course, I didn't really understand the theorem at a meaningful level; to me it was just another opportunity to abstract some pure, clean math out of it. (I majored in algebraic topology, if that tells you anything.)
What was the question now?
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qqmike View PostYou hit the jugular there, you identified a famous and often misunderstood quote from Bukowski (which is also on his grave stone): Don't try.
I've run into different expressions of this rule in different places through the years (do what your hand turns to naturally, follow a path of heart), but 'Don't try' is typical Bukowski, brief and hits right on. Certainly applies to the arts, but I think also to math and sciences (perhaps a la Paul Halmos's position that much of (doing) math is art, working as an artist).
To be honest, the only modern-day mathematicians I'm even passingly familiar with are Andrew Wiles (because he proved Fermat's Last Theorem) and Marcus du Sautoy (because I watch BBC's 'Horizon' shows).
Originally posted by SteveRiley View PostWhat was this thread supposed to be about again?
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
-
... but we extended it to semantics, linguistics, philosophy (general), philosophy of mathematics, barfly poetry, and No Exit.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
You hit the jugular there, you identified a famous and often misunderstood quote from Bukowski (which is also on his grave stone): Don't try.
I've run into different expressions of this rule in different places through the years (do what your hand turns to naturally, follow a path of heart), but 'Don't try' is typical Bukowski, brief and hits right on. Certainly applies to the arts, but I think also to math and sciences (perhaps a la Paul Halmos's position that much of (doing) math is art, working as an artist).
"So much to learn, so many experiences to be had, so little time to do it all in. Mortality is annoying."
Well said!
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: