Originally posted by SteveRiley
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OpenSuse KDE 12.2
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Pan-Galactic QuordlepleenSo Long, and Thanks for All the Fish
- Jul 2011
- 9524
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Send PM
-
Ok so there is a version of Quassel that uses mono and another that doesn't. So openSUSE seemingly just chose the mono version.
I tried the new Fedora 18 installer and I have to say it looks quite good although I dislike how there was a feature regression. Fedora should not aim to be a "desktop" os. It's for development and testing. It really isn't a good beginner distro so why target it at newbies.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Code:zypper se -s quassel Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository --+--------------------------+---------+-----------+--------+----------------------- | quassel-base | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | x86_64 | openSUSE-factory-Oss | quassel-base | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | i586 | openSUSE-factory-Oss | quassel-client | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | x86_64 | openSUSE-factory-Oss | quassel-client | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | i586 | openSUSE-factory-Oss | quassel-client-debuginfo | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | x86_64 | openSUSE-factory-Debug | quassel-client-debuginfo | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | i586 | openSUSE-factory-Debug | quassel-core | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | x86_64 | openSUSE-factory-Oss | quassel-core | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | i586 | openSUSE-factory-Oss | quassel-core-debuginfo | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | x86_64 | openSUSE-factory-Debug | quassel-core-debuginfo | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | i586 | openSUSE-factory-Debug | quassel-debugsource | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | x86_64 | openSUSE-factory-Debug | quassel-debugsource | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | i586 | openSUSE-factory-Debug | quassel-mono | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | x86_64 | openSUSE-factory-Oss | quassel-mono | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | i586 | openSUSE-factory-Oss | quassel-mono-debuginfo | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | x86_64 | openSUSE-factory-Debug | quassel-mono-debuginfo | package | 0.8.0-4.4 | i586 | openSUSE-factory-Debug
https://build.opensuse.org/package/b...enSUSE_Factorysigpic
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
I purchased 22 box sets of SuSE but moved to Mandrake when Novell bought it.
I've had a lot of experience with the RPM paradigm. When I tried LibraNet the deb manager was outstanding, but the guy who was developing it died, so I moved to several RPM distros, all of which exhibited RPM frailities. Then I tried Kubuntu 9.04.
I doubt I will ever return to an RPM based distro again."A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
– John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Oh ok, my assumption of it mentioning mono meaning mono was used was poor. Learn something new everyday.
I've never fallen into RPM hell fortunately but I have seen a few people fall into it. The upsides to RPM though is delta upgrades which is a godsend for slow connections and really good multi-arch support. I tried to write a .spec file for my python program and I soon found the whole experience painful even though openSUSE has great documentation. The same .deb was a breeze to make and I'm guareteed it will work on all debian/ubuntu distros thanks to a great video guide I found which I couldn't get for openSUSE.
Still when it comes to a newbie KDE distro with a great community and a debian/ubuntu heritage the Kubuntu is always my recommended distro. Also Kubuntu makes the best portable OS I have ever used whereas everything else is just too bare or too bloated or lacks good persistence.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
Comment