I saw some post raving about it so I decided to boot the LiveDVD.
I was greeted with an xterm batch process that gave me 7 options. I chose #2, which is with ACPI enabled.
SEVEN minutes later I was presented with a Kubuntu 4.7 desktop. Some have reported waiting 20 minutes for the DE to appear.
Had to enable sound and then make adjustments to KMixer to hear event themes.
The xserver was accelerated.
My realtek 8192CE wireless chip wasn't recognized and no commands in a Konsole would revive it.
I could not find a way to switch to the classic menu structure.
System Settings had only half the options available to it that Kubuntu has.
It was, to me, like dropping back to the earliest Kubuntu release, or MEPIS 3, or Mandrake.
IOW, it is amazing how much better KDE in Kubuntu is than KDE under PC-BSD.
PC-BSD is not Linux, but it is a *nix. One could safely say that PC-BSD is so user unfriendly that only a geek could love it. It will never appeal to anyone else, and not many geeks.
I was greeted with an xterm batch process that gave me 7 options. I chose #2, which is with ACPI enabled.
SEVEN minutes later I was presented with a Kubuntu 4.7 desktop. Some have reported waiting 20 minutes for the DE to appear.
Had to enable sound and then make adjustments to KMixer to hear event themes.
The xserver was accelerated.
My realtek 8192CE wireless chip wasn't recognized and no commands in a Konsole would revive it.
I could not find a way to switch to the classic menu structure.
System Settings had only half the options available to it that Kubuntu has.
It was, to me, like dropping back to the earliest Kubuntu release, or MEPIS 3, or Mandrake.
IOW, it is amazing how much better KDE in Kubuntu is than KDE under PC-BSD.
PC-BSD is not Linux, but it is a *nix. One could safely say that PC-BSD is so user unfriendly that only a geek could love it. It will never appeal to anyone else, and not many geeks.
Comment