Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

    DYK!!!

    VERY GOOD!!!! Now THAT is the kind of discussion that is productive!

    Bravo!

    Please place the above in the context of the former flame wars at the main Ubuntu forums about the "Christian Avatar".

    Please allow me to do a small recap for those new to the Linux community.

    There was, and then was not, and now there is, at the Ubu Forums a sub forum for discussion of CE or Christian Edition of Ubuntu.

    Beware any Christian who stepped even slightly outside that sub forum.

    Unfortunately, a few did, either asking questions or responding to questions.

    And OMG.........."some" people SAW a "Christian Avatar"!!!

    I mean, it was as if the world had stopped spinning on it's axis!! the world would cease to function because the horrid IMAGE of that Christian avatar so BLINDED, the Christian hating Linux people that they would probably be forever like Bruce Springsteen's deuce coupe! NATSFS!!

    Now....one must also put this into the perspective of the "CE" person who ventured out of his, or her, little confines...

    He...or she....HAD to endure the various "evil" avatars......because that is just the way it was.....

    What is good for the Linux liberal/progressive/Christian Hating person does not apply to the despicable Christian.

    End of short history for those new to Linux.

    "Liberality" .......USED to be about "tolerance"....that all forms of thought are equal.....

    and those are the words used today....but they were not practiced at Ubu forums....

    And still today, in the "society" at large in the U.S. and to a certain extent Europe.... Christian thought is not tolerated but any OTHER type of thought is fawned upon....

    Witness, unfortunately gone, the massive thread of over 12,000 posts at the Former Castle Cops about "Islam" that was supposedly started by a Muslim but was really started by one of the normal denizens..

    Linuxdom was the "non" believing playground and every body else should not make waves in the tranquil water within which the Linux atheist lived, moved, and had his/her being.

    Going back to the Ubu Forum thing.

    The powers that be said that the situation of screaming at Christians was not acceptable so a bunch of the Ubu people formed a "evil worshiping" Linux called Satanic Linux.... to which I provide a link but WARN FOLKS THAT THERE ARE IMAGES that will be disturbing to some.

    http://ubuntusatanic.org/news/

    Again, the point being, that it was, and still is for some, perfectly ok to offend Christians, but it was not, and to many still is not for some ok to offend a "non" Christian.

    And again, that situation did not extend to Shinto, Hindu, Islam, or the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

    Soooooo to return to DYK's post....

    again BRAVO!!! the post shows that there are many, I think MOST of the Linux community that could just "really care less" about all of this....

    In U.S. society at large, and to a certain extent in Europe..

    The lefties scream at the righties

    The righties scream at the lefties....

    The non-religionists scream at the religionists and the religionists scream right back.

    While the REST of the people are "just trying to get along".

    It used to be that the U.S. was considered to be a "melting pot"... wherein people at least TRIED to get along together....

    But that changed in the sixties when there was great advocacy that the U.S. never was a "melting pot" and that we should just forget that "outmoded way of thinking".

    The problem is that even though it probably "never was" a melting pot, that way of putting down "outmoded thought(in their perception) ... was the beginning of a long downhill slide to the screamfests of today...

    But at least people TRIED to make it one... and when I entered Linux I thought it was supposed to be a place in which one stood on one's merit. But, going back to Xandros that is not the way it was.. but....

    As so succinctly stated by DYK..... I think that most people now are "moving beyond" it...

    .....and as was so aptly put by vinnywright...people are getting beyond .... lables.

    Again...BRAVO ! DYK and Vinny !!!

    woodsmoke

    Comment


      #17
      Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

      As Vinny basically said, labels suck.

      Are you referring to UbuntuForums.org? I used to post there a lot but got tired of being censored and/or scolded via PM for saying things like "windoze."

      As for labels, you know what's funny? My best friend and I--if one paid attention to labels--are polar opposites. She's a staunch, lifelong Republican and I'm a...well, a used-to-be-staunch, still lifelong Democrat. We both despise Obama so that's good, but when we met, Bush was in office and we couldn't have been more opposite as far as politics. But it didn't matter. We see each other for the many facets we each have, and don't define each other based on labels. I'd do anything for her and vice versa--in fact, she came 3,000 miles to take care of me post-brain surgery. (We met in Dallas; I'm now back home in CA and she's living in NC.) So screw labels! They're meaningless and can be hurtful.
      Xenix/UNIX user since 1985 | Linux user since 1991 | Was registered Linux user #163544

      Comment


        #18
        Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

        Thanks for the great post DYK.

        As to the surgery, you seem to be not too much the worse for wear, because your replies are always, pithy, cogent and much too tolerant of the wold woodsmoker!

        woodsmoke

        Comment


          #19
          Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

          Originally posted by DoYouKubuntu
          She's a staunch, lifelong Republican and I'm a...well, a used-to-be-staunch, still lifelong Democrat. We both despise Obama so that's good...
          Shared loathing, but probably for completely opposite reasons?

          Comment


            #20
            Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

            Well I am new here, and surprised that political discussions are allowed. I prefer no to see them on a Linux forum but that is just me, and I can ignore them.

            By the way several posts referring to people new to the Linux world when the poster means new to the Ubuntu world. Ubuntu does not equal Linux. There are many other Linux distros, and long time Linux users that would not have a clue about the internecine Ubuntu wars.
            Linux because it works. No social or political motives in my decision to use it.
            Always consider Occam's Razor
            Rich

            Comment


              #21
              Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

              Originally posted by woodsmoke
              Thanks for the great post DYK.
              You're welcome.

              As to the surgery, you seem to be not too much the worse for wear, because your replies are always, pithy, cogent and much too tolerant of the wold woodsmoker!
              Ah, thanks. I try not to make a big deal of it, but the truth is that the surgery left me with a variety of issues that really suck. For one, they had to remove the vestibular nerve because they couldn't dissect the tumor away from it; losing that nerve meant I had to re-learn how to stand up, walk, etc., without falling over as it's the nerve that controls balance. (Luckily, we're born with one on each side, so the remaining one could be re-trained following the removal of the other one.) I still have some balance issues--I don't do well on uneven surfaces, like lawns, but for the most part I'm okay. They were able to dissect the tumor away from the auditory nerve so, although I did lose some hearing on the right side, I still have some and I'm grateful for that. I still have some facial paralysis but it's MUCH improved from the months immediately post-op. And I have ridiculously high blood pressure that is extremely resistant to medication--I've been on a cocktail of five different BP meds for over a year and my BP is still high but better than it was. And, finally, I still get craniotomy-related headaches...like when I was trying to get my new router working and it just wouldn't!
              Xenix/UNIX user since 1985 | Linux user since 1991 | Was registered Linux user #163544

              Comment


                #22
                Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

                Originally posted by richb
                Well I am new here, and surprised that political discussions are allowed. I prefer no to see them on a Linux forum but that is just me, and I can ignore them.
                That's the intent of our Social/Casual Talk forum. Many of us here have gotten to know each other well, so we use this forum to discuss and exchange ideas that don't belong on the forums dedicated to various Linux and Kubuntu topics.

                We strive to keep the conversation civil. While it's perfectly fine to disagree with what a person wrote, it's unacceptable to directly attack individuals. At KFN, we seem to maintain a level of mature discourse that's often rare elsewhere. It's one reason why I spend so much time here.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

                  Originally posted by SteveRiley
                  Originally posted by richb
                  Well I am new here, and surprised that political discussions are allowed. I prefer no to see them on a Linux forum but that is just me, and I can ignore them.
                  That's the intent of our Social/Casual Talk forum. Many of us here have gotten to know each other well, so we use this forum to discuss and exchange ideas that don't belong on the forums dedicated to various Linux and Kubuntu topics.
                  Right. And it's great to have a board like this.

                  We strive to keep the conversation civil. While it's perfectly fine to disagree with what a person wrote, it's unacceptable to directly attack individuals. At KFN, we seem to maintain a level of mature discourse that's often rare elsewhere. It's one reason why I spend so much time here.
                  I've been posting online since back in the old BBS days, and RARELY have I found a place with the maturity level and general ambience of KFN.

                  Originally posted by SteveRiley
                  Originally posted by DoYouKubuntu
                  She's a staunch, lifelong Republican and I'm a...well, a used-to-be-staunch, still lifelong Democrat. We both despise Obama so that's good...
                  Shared loathing, but probably for completely opposite reasons?
                  That's a little hard to say. We both feel, strongly, that Obama was totally unqualified to be POTUS--and as I mentioned before, I think he's proven that since being in office. That's pretty much it as far as why either of us dislikes him, although my friend is much less inclined to vote outside party lines than I am. I've always felt that my vote should go to the person most qualified for a position--whether or not they're from "my" party. Historically I've certainly voted for Democrats MUCH more than Republicans (or others), but I have no problem voting outside my party.

                  I also feel very strongly that one shouldn't vote for a candidate because of his/her race, gender, religion, or anything else, but ONLY because of their qualifications for the position they're seeking. I VERY much want to see a female president in my lifetime, and I supported Hillary Clinton, as I've said before, to the Nth degree--but I supported her because she was QUALIFIED to be president, not because she's female. Hence the reason I would never vote for Sarah Palin! She may be female, and I may want to see a female POTUS before I die, but I want a qualified female president, so, yeah, Palin will never get my vote! By the same token, I wanted to see a black president during my lifetime...but a qualified one.
                  Xenix/UNIX user since 1985 | Linux user since 1991 | Was registered Linux user #163544

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

                    What, in your mind then, makes President Obama unqualified to be President? He is Constitutional qualified (35+ years in age, citizen, in the country for at least 14 years, etc.), but what else is necessary?
                    The unjust distribution of goods persists, creating a situation of social sin that cries out to Heaven and limits the possibilities of a fuller life for so many of our brothers. -- Archbishop Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires (now Pope Francis)

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

                      DYK when you mentioned cocktail, I naturally assumed....and was wrong!

                      woodsmoke

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

                        Originally posted by bsniadajewski
                        What, in your mind then, makes President Obama unqualified to be President? He is Constitutional qualified (35+ years in age, citizen, in the country for at least 14 years, etc.), but what else is necessary?
                        I said earlier that I didn't want to start a flame war over politics, so my gut instinct is to not respond to this...but what the hell?! (Mods, feel free to delete this if it's deemed too flame-war-starting-ish.)

                        Seriously, if you think the attributes you mentioned are the ONLY "qualifications" necessary to be POTUS, you're very misguided. How about political experience? Or military experience? Or leadership experience? Or not having a history of being a liar? How about not lying about your religion? Take a look at this unadulterated photograph of Obama's Indonesian school registration, taking particular note of his religion: Islam. How about not lying about who you've known during your lifetime--like terrorist William Ayers? Obama's Chicago Annenberg Challenge and William Ayers' Small Schools Workshop shared an office for three years--that can be proven by tax returns--yet Obama lies about it. He lied about various votes he supposedly made as an Illinois senator--lies that can be proven on the Illinois Senate's own web site, which has complete records of every vote, or lack thereof, made by every senator. He even lied about having "voted against the war" (Iraq)--something that was impossible since he wasn't in office at the time. Then there's his lie about how "the March on Selma got me born”--um, Obama was born 08/04/61, while the march on Selma began 03/07/65. I could go on...and on...but I'll stop now as I think I've made my point.
                        Xenix/UNIX user since 1985 | Linux user since 1991 | Was registered Linux user #163544

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

                          Originally posted by woodsmoke
                          DYK when you mentioned cocktail, I naturally assumed....and was wrong!
                          Nope, not THAT kind of cocktail.
                          Xenix/UNIX user since 1985 | Linux user since 1991 | Was registered Linux user #163544

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

                            Originally posted by DoYouKubuntu
                            Originally posted by bsniadajewski
                            What, in your mind then, makes President Obama unqualified to be President? He is Constitutional qualified (35+ years in age, citizen, in the country for at least 14 years, etc.), but what else is necessary?
                            I said earlier that I didn't want to start a flame war over politics, so my gut instinct is to not respond to this...but what the hell?! (Mods, feel free to delete this if it's deemed too flame-war-starting-ish.)

                            Seriously, if you think the attributes you mentioned are the ONLY "qualifications" necessary to be POTUS, you're very misguided. How about political experience? Or military experience? Or leadership experience? Or not having a history of being a liar? How about not lying about your religion? Take a look at this unadulterated photograph of Obama's Indonesian school registration, taking particular note of his religion: Islam. How about not lying about who you've known during your lifetime--like terrorist William Ayers? Obama's Chicago Annenberg Challenge and William Ayers' Small Schools Workshop shared an office for three years--that can be proven by tax returns--yet Obama lies about it. He lied about various votes he supposedly made as an Illinois senator--lies that can be proven on the Illinois Senate's own web site, which has complete records of every vote, or lack thereof, made by every senator. He even lied about having "voted against the war" (Iraq)--something that was impossible since he wasn't in office at the time. Then there's his lie about how "the March on Selma got me born”--um, Obama was born 08/04/61, while the march on Selma began 03/07/65. I could go on...and on...but I'll stop now as I think I've made my point.
                            Great example of why I do not like politics on a Linux forum. Haters!
                            Linux because it works. No social or political motives in my decision to use it.
                            Always consider Occam's Razor
                            Rich

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

                              I'm traveling presently but feel it's appropriate to mention a few points.

                              First: please recall the distinction between challenging someone's ideas vs. hurling an accusatory personal attack. Summarizing another person's post into a single emotion-laden word could be misinterpreted.

                              Second: providing evidence to support claims always helps to bolster an argument. So does an understanding of situational awareness. Few of us have actually lived outside the US in nations where one's claimed religious identity could determine his or her permanent future.

                              Third: I'll admit to a degree of responsibility here, as I've encouraged the conversation to continue. "The three things you aren't supposed to talk about at dinner" are truly core to what it means to be human. We can't pretend them out of existence.

                              Fourth: The Social/Casual Talk forum is not required reading for any of us. Those who participate here do so out of a genuine interest to engage and nurture friendships outside the technical realm. That said, I will shut down this thread if it overheats.

                              Now then: carry on

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Re: liberal progressive elites look here!!!!

                                richb, you DO have the option of choosing not to click in to this thread, you know. While you are entitled to your opinion, I agree with the first point made by SteveRiley. I find this thread interesting and enjoyable--all of it, even DYK's Reply #25 which I happen to disagree with. The Social/Casual Talk forum is a great place to get to know each other and discuss other-than-technical things in life.
                                An intellectual says a simple thing in a hard way. An artist says a hard thing in a simple way. Charles Bukowski

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X