If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You will have to register
before you can post. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Please do not use the CODE tag when pasting content that contains formatting (colored, bold, underline, italic, etc).
The CODE tag displays all content as plain text, including the formatting tags, making it difficult to read.
The following Topic Prefixes are designated for use in Community Cafe:
DS (Distribution Showdown)
GN (Geek News)
KLD (Kubuntu or Linux Discussion)
TWC (The Water Cooler)
KUT (Kubuntu User Testimony)
NRD (Next Release Discussion)
While use is not required, doing so allows for efficient Filtering.
My take is that Dropbox allowed themselves to get marginalized to feature status because they've steadfastly refused to innovate:
their free tier is only 2 GB, whereas most other online services offer more
syncing only one folder rather than a full hierarchy
delayed and incomplete API
repeated instances of reported security problems
until recently, unclear communications that having them manage your encryption key is essentially equivalent to having no encryption at all
SugarSync and Box.net, by offering far greater capabilities, are less of a target for OS absorption. Now if only SugarSync would get a Linux client out the friggin' door, I'd be one happy syncer.
Comment