Re: Can we ever have a perfect distro? A call to the community
PackageKit doesn't even come into play when using apt. It's only when using KPK that PK is involved. As for PK itself, you were the first one to mention it as a backend, so I kinda followed
The confusion we have is due to the nature of the thing. PK itself interfaces with package managers on the lowest level, basically telling them what to do, but it also has abilities like updating the cache without elevatig privileges. If that's a front or a back end per se, I dunno, and even the docs, when present, are cryptic. But I don't see how it could affect apt, which does not invoke it in any way when doing a --purge. KPK, GPK are frontends for Packagekit iself, and I think there's even a CLI frontend. I think that most of the gripe with KPK in Ubuntu has been due to the fact that PK, although universal in nature, is much better geared towards rpms. There's been an effort to avoid the problems with it by forking it into aptdaemon, but the only advantage USC with aptdeamon has over it is due to prettier graphics. Since PK has landed in Wheezy, and since Debian is in line with the whole AppStream thing, I think we might be into some good stuff. I hope Canonical get on board with this one, cuz PK just hand down beats aptdeamon.
Originally posted by bsniadajewski
The confusion we have is due to the nature of the thing. PK itself interfaces with package managers on the lowest level, basically telling them what to do, but it also has abilities like updating the cache without elevatig privileges. If that's a front or a back end per se, I dunno, and even the docs, when present, are cryptic. But I don't see how it could affect apt, which does not invoke it in any way when doing a --purge. KPK, GPK are frontends for Packagekit iself, and I think there's even a CLI frontend. I think that most of the gripe with KPK in Ubuntu has been due to the fact that PK, although universal in nature, is much better geared towards rpms. There's been an effort to avoid the problems with it by forking it into aptdaemon, but the only advantage USC with aptdeamon has over it is due to prettier graphics. Since PK has landed in Wheezy, and since Debian is in line with the whole AppStream thing, I think we might be into some good stuff. I hope Canonical get on board with this one, cuz PK just hand down beats aptdeamon.
Comment