Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If only GW were true, we may need it ...

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    If only GW were true, we may need it ...

    Earth may be headed for a second Maunder Minimum, a 70-year period with virtually no sunspots :
    The Sun normally follows an 11-year cycle of activity. The current cycle, Cycle 24, is now supposed to be ramping up towards maximum strength. Increased numbers of sunspots and other indications ought to be happening: but in fact results so far are most disappointing. Scientists at the NSO now suspect, based on data showing decades-long trends leading to this point, that Cycle 25 may not happen at all.

    This could have major implications for the Earth's climate
    ...
    As NASA notes:

    Early records of sunspots indicate that the Sun went through a period of inactivity in the late 17th century. Very few sunspots were seen on the Sun from about 1645 to 1715. Although the observations were not as extensive as in later years, the Sun was in fact well observed during this time and this lack of sunspots is well documented. This period of solar inactivity also corresponds to a climatic period called the "Little Ice Age" when rivers that are normally ice-free froze and snow fields remained year-round at lower altitudes. There is evidence that the Sun has had similar periods of inactivity in the more distant past.
    ...
    "This is highly unusual and unexpected," says Dr Frank Hill of the NSO. "But the fact that three completely different views of the Sun point in the same direction is a powerful indicator that the sunspot cycle may be going into hibernation."
    What a time for oil supplies to be dwindling...
    "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
    – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

    #2
    Re: If only GW were true, we may need it ...

    I remember that a "prominent" aeronautics engineer opined.....during the Carter Administration....that....

    THIS IS KIND OF "SCIENTIFICY" way of saying things..... but....TRY TO UNDERSTAND.....

    "Aerodynamics, does not admit of style".

    That means, essentially, that to have a TRUELY "aerodynamic" car....it has to be in either the "X" or "Y" axis... or preferably both axes..... to be "bullet" or "liquid drop" shape....

    GG DO NOT HOLD ME TO THE LAST...WE BOTH KNOW THE COMPROMISES in that sentence.....

    Anywhooooooooooooo

    The simple facts are the Maunder Minimum, the "freezing of the Thames".....etc.....this is "cyclical" and is to almost 90 percent a "large part"....dependent upon the Solar Cycles....

    Instead of trying to stop the cutting of the Brazilian Rainforest because the "smarter than thoues" think that everybody else thinks on a fourth grade level....

    And trying to do a "smoke and mirrors" "cap and trade".....

    we should maybe....think that the U.S. electorate can actually accept(not believe) a cogent presentation, as was done by Carl Sagan about "Nuclear Winter".....

    AND...

    get on with....stopping the cutting of the rain forest....which REALLY DOES.....affect the whole world's weather....


    and then spend MONEY on getting things going in the U.S. so that the REST OF THE WORLD...does not catch a.....

    an....

    .....um,mmmmmm

    unnecessary.....cold....

    MY RANT.......if the supposedly "intelligent" college educated ELITISTS...did not think that "EVERYBODY ELSE"...is STOOPID........then the "everybody else" might actually be able to be INFORMED...and do the right thing ....

    instead of being DUPED...to do the right thing...

    woodsmoke

    Comment

    Working...
    X