Today I read a post of a windows user stating that the Virut virus (yeah what an original name) is spreading across windows computers and infecting jpeg, gif, bmp, txt, mp3 and doc files. He stated that according to some article (I don't know which one, he never mentioned it anywhere on his post) there was no cure, no patch to fix it, no antivirus could detect it and the only solution available was to format the partition (or the whole harddisk since many windows users only count on a single partition for the entire hdd to hold their personal data) and reinstall Windows (as usual).
At the end of his scary post he said they ("the forumers") already know Linux is perfect (something I never said, I just stated it was more secure by default IMVHO) and I, kyonides, shouldn't brainwash them by promoting Linux (even if I only do it every so often for free because I believe it's what's keeping my PC safe and stable and reliable for the last 2 years). Man, I really thought it was an insult and a very narrow minded point of view. How can he dare to comment I'm brainwashing them just because I tell them why Linux is a good choice to keep your PC secure without the need to install a single AV? Isn't he worried a virus could make their PC's crash? Isn't he telling everybody that their personal data is doomed if their PC's got infected? Besides several users here and on several other Linux oriented fora already stated that any Windows based file isn't really capable of making a Linux OS get infected and useless, or am I wrong here? Didn't some of you mention that logging into a Linux OS was a good idea if you wanted to get rid of a virus on a Windows OS? IDK what that forumer was thinking at the time he accused me of manipulating them by promoting Linux in a passive and peaceful and respectful way.
BTW, I recommended them they could format their hdd's so they could have at least a ext(3 or 4) (and a swap) partition and install a Linux OS as a backup OS or even as the primary one and do any transactions while on Linux.
At the end of his scary post he said they ("the forumers") already know Linux is perfect (something I never said, I just stated it was more secure by default IMVHO) and I, kyonides, shouldn't brainwash them by promoting Linux (even if I only do it every so often for free because I believe it's what's keeping my PC safe and stable and reliable for the last 2 years). Man, I really thought it was an insult and a very narrow minded point of view. How can he dare to comment I'm brainwashing them just because I tell them why Linux is a good choice to keep your PC secure without the need to install a single AV? Isn't he worried a virus could make their PC's crash? Isn't he telling everybody that their personal data is doomed if their PC's got infected? Besides several users here and on several other Linux oriented fora already stated that any Windows based file isn't really capable of making a Linux OS get infected and useless, or am I wrong here? Didn't some of you mention that logging into a Linux OS was a good idea if you wanted to get rid of a virus on a Windows OS? IDK what that forumer was thinking at the time he accused me of manipulating them by promoting Linux in a passive and peaceful and respectful way.
BTW, I recommended them they could format their hdd's so they could have at least a ext(3 or 4) (and a swap) partition and install a Linux OS as a backup OS or even as the primary one and do any transactions while on Linux.
Comment