Re: I may be tired, but...
We're also here to rant, to criticize MS as always, to tell people that KDE 4 is staying and 3.5 is about to disappear in a few months or years, I don't know...
I can't say Kubuntu is the worst KDE implementation. For me it's sometimes more stable than sidux with KDE (the lite version) because I don't need to reinstall it as often as I did with sidux, but that's my opinion. I could also be because I'm new to sidux. One implementation I disliked was OpenSUSE KDE because it really demanded more memory than Kubuntu and Sidux but it worked well, the screen resolution didn't change after I set it up once upon reboot. Even so KDE rocks, it's nice looking, modern and allows you to code in Qt4 which seems to be not as difficult as coding in C or (original) C++. It just needs more time to reimplement some old features or incorporate new ones, that's all, but the results are good imo.
We're also here to rant, to criticize MS as always, to tell people that KDE 4 is staying and 3.5 is about to disappear in a few months or years, I don't know...
I can't say Kubuntu is the worst KDE implementation. For me it's sometimes more stable than sidux with KDE (the lite version) because I don't need to reinstall it as often as I did with sidux, but that's my opinion. I could also be because I'm new to sidux. One implementation I disliked was OpenSUSE KDE because it really demanded more memory than Kubuntu and Sidux but it worked well, the screen resolution didn't change after I set it up once upon reboot. Even so KDE rocks, it's nice looking, modern and allows you to code in Qt4 which seems to be not as difficult as coding in C or (original) C++. It just needs more time to reimplement some old features or incorporate new ones, that's all, but the results are good imo.
Comment