This post isn't aimed at casting a dark shadow over the hard work the developers have put into making Kubuntu what is is. However, there are a few things that have grown on me over the years and I just wanted to share them in no particular order.
I've been running Kubuntu since the day of Warty the Hedgehog. Yes, I've encountered some obstacles but I was always eager to learn, read, re-learn and move on. I still would not call myself an expert in the *nix land but the most recent two releases have left me with a few questions.
1. While KDE 4.2.2 looks great, the performance from machine to machine varies. However, I do need to ask why does Kubuntu 8.10 and 9.04 all of a sudden hate my ATI X1550? Yes, I have used 7.04, 7.10, 8.04 on this same machine but never, have I been so haunted with issues concerning shutdown, reboot and frequent crashes even on a clean install.
2. Is it possible that another *nix variation could run so smoothly on one machine only to have 9.04 crash on install, butt out error messages like the one attached even when CD verification was successful on the very same machine?
3. I know I'm using the 64bit variation, has been since Dapper Drake anyhow and have not run into these show stoppers that I'm getting. Right now, I'm quadraple booting and had it not been for another installation, I'd be without a working install. But are my issues related only to 64 bit? I hope that's not the case.
4. I do want to continue using Kubuntu as my main OS, but right now, sadly, I have had to revert to ArchLinux with kdemod as my working install. Did something go wrong with the last two or can we blame kde 4?
Finally, it's been said here and in other forums that Kubuntu is a foster child of Canonical. I cannot prove/disprove the allegations, but somehow, I feel that Ubuntu gets way more attention in having a polished final product than it does with Kubuntu. I'm not sure part of my experience is due to me having an ATI Raedeon Card x series (x1550) that I keep running into display problems although I never had them prior to 8.10 or it could be an xorg issue, but I'm just wondering if the age old story of Kubuntu provides a watered down version of kde does hold any salt. I'd like to hear others feedback on the issue.
I'm open to suggestions.
I've been running Kubuntu since the day of Warty the Hedgehog. Yes, I've encountered some obstacles but I was always eager to learn, read, re-learn and move on. I still would not call myself an expert in the *nix land but the most recent two releases have left me with a few questions.
1. While KDE 4.2.2 looks great, the performance from machine to machine varies. However, I do need to ask why does Kubuntu 8.10 and 9.04 all of a sudden hate my ATI X1550? Yes, I have used 7.04, 7.10, 8.04 on this same machine but never, have I been so haunted with issues concerning shutdown, reboot and frequent crashes even on a clean install.
2. Is it possible that another *nix variation could run so smoothly on one machine only to have 9.04 crash on install, butt out error messages like the one attached even when CD verification was successful on the very same machine?
3. I know I'm using the 64bit variation, has been since Dapper Drake anyhow and have not run into these show stoppers that I'm getting. Right now, I'm quadraple booting and had it not been for another installation, I'd be without a working install. But are my issues related only to 64 bit? I hope that's not the case.
4. I do want to continue using Kubuntu as my main OS, but right now, sadly, I have had to revert to ArchLinux with kdemod as my working install. Did something go wrong with the last two or can we blame kde 4?
Finally, it's been said here and in other forums that Kubuntu is a foster child of Canonical. I cannot prove/disprove the allegations, but somehow, I feel that Ubuntu gets way more attention in having a polished final product than it does with Kubuntu. I'm not sure part of my experience is due to me having an ATI Raedeon Card x series (x1550) that I keep running into display problems although I never had them prior to 8.10 or it could be an xorg issue, but I'm just wondering if the age old story of Kubuntu provides a watered down version of kde does hold any salt. I'd like to hear others feedback on the issue.
I'm open to suggestions.
Comment