Many years ago, I tried to install Debian "Woody" onto my (then) Sony VAIO laptop. Long story short, it was a tedious endeavor that didn't leave me with that warm fuzzy feeling. To many issues (initially) and problems with the PC and Windoze that prevented useful dual-booting. I quit the attempt.
In March of 2007 I discovered Kubuntu - Edgy Eft - and began with a dual-boot installation. Eventually, I dumped Windoze completely in favor of a pure Linux laptop (my Toshiba Satellite). Bill still exists, but he is now safely encased within a VMware VM 'box.' Since beginning with Edgy, I've progressed through and up to Intrepid Ibex (w/KDE 4.2.00). I've been happy and pleased with the favorable experience that Kubuntu has provided for me. I have tried a few other distros - Mint (for all of the time it took to boot from the LiveCD - didn't care for the 'look and feel' of it), DreamLinux (also from a LiveCD - actually a very nice distro, but not for me), DSL (Damn Small Linux - a very smartly designed 'minimal' Linux), and Knoppix (probably the best 'Swiss Army Knife' of Linux distros).
Now comes sidux. I don't remember where I first came across/heard of it. Looked at it, but until yesterday, I had not considered trying it. Knowing someone who was using it gave me the extra impetus needed to give it a go. Based on the Debian "Sid" development branch, and using KDE 3.5.10, it turns out to be a very nice (shall I say polished?) Linux distro. It recognized everything I had on the laptop, including my PCMCIA Type II Kingston 5G HD and on-board sound. My ethernet (wired) was recognized and running from the start. Haven't tested my wireless yet, but I'm confident it will 'just work' as well.
sidux package maintenance is very different from the way it is done in the *buntus. All installs, removals, updates, and dist-upgrades are done from outside of X. In fact, the X server must not be running. This means that apt-get install/remove/purge/upgrade/dist-upgrade are done from the terminal in init 3. The reasons for this are clearly stated on the sidux web site.
sidux, for me, is turning out to be a very nice Linux distro, and has become my third Linux OS on my laptop.
In March of 2007 I discovered Kubuntu - Edgy Eft - and began with a dual-boot installation. Eventually, I dumped Windoze completely in favor of a pure Linux laptop (my Toshiba Satellite). Bill still exists, but he is now safely encased within a VMware VM 'box.' Since beginning with Edgy, I've progressed through and up to Intrepid Ibex (w/KDE 4.2.00). I've been happy and pleased with the favorable experience that Kubuntu has provided for me. I have tried a few other distros - Mint (for all of the time it took to boot from the LiveCD - didn't care for the 'look and feel' of it), DreamLinux (also from a LiveCD - actually a very nice distro, but not for me), DSL (Damn Small Linux - a very smartly designed 'minimal' Linux), and Knoppix (probably the best 'Swiss Army Knife' of Linux distros).
Now comes sidux. I don't remember where I first came across/heard of it. Looked at it, but until yesterday, I had not considered trying it. Knowing someone who was using it gave me the extra impetus needed to give it a go. Based on the Debian "Sid" development branch, and using KDE 3.5.10, it turns out to be a very nice (shall I say polished?) Linux distro. It recognized everything I had on the laptop, including my PCMCIA Type II Kingston 5G HD and on-board sound. My ethernet (wired) was recognized and running from the start. Haven't tested my wireless yet, but I'm confident it will 'just work' as well.
sidux package maintenance is very different from the way it is done in the *buntus. All installs, removals, updates, and dist-upgrades are done from outside of X. In fact, the X server must not be running. This means that apt-get install/remove/purge/upgrade/dist-upgrade are done from the terminal in init 3. The reasons for this are clearly stated on the sidux web site.
sidux, for me, is turning out to be a very nice Linux distro, and has become my third Linux OS on my laptop.
Comment