Face in images

[calcmandan]

Can someone tell me I'm not crazy please? I have two screenshots on flickr with supposed sasquaches. I captured them off youtube and brought them into Kino. I can't see them and I'm skeptical.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/22067935@N07/

[klerfayt]

Re: Face in images

sasquaches fall into the same category as gnomes, santa, fairies, etc ...

[calcmandan]

Re: Face in images

and ufo's and ghosts. But anyway, did you see anything in the photo? If I see anything, it's a natural pattern in nature and nothing else.

[klerfayt]

Re: Face in images

and ufo's and ghosts. But anyway, did you see anything in the photo? If I see anything, it's a natural pattern in nature and nothing else.

I can see trees only, care to give youtube link?

[calcmandan]

Re: Face in images

Here is the link. You may want to have an aspirin on hand. The camera panning around and shaking is really tiring on the eyes.

Just Wild

[klerfayt]

Re: Face in images

Here is the link. You may want to have an aspirin on hand. The camera panning around and shaking is really tiring on the eyes.

Just Wild

this video is ridiculous, why did you even bother ...

[calcmandan]

Re: Face in images

That's what I wanted to hear. Thanks.

[calcmandan]

Re: Face in images

Here is the link. You may want to have an aspirin on hand. The camera panning around and shaking is really tiring on the eyes.

Just Wild

this video is ridiculous, why did you even bother ...

I really enjoy picking apart the examples and showing them that there is no basis in their claims. I went through the video. The image titled justwild2 does have what seems to have a face, but it's really just a physical pattern of leaves, twigs, and background. It's not a face at all. Otherwise, you'd see a body attached to it. The people out there who claim paranormal activity (ie bigfoot, ufo's, chupacabra, elvis, elves, santa), are delusional at best.

Just consider it a hobby of mine.