I'm going to be switching from Keepass2 to Keepass XC Snap version. And I was wondering if anyone here uses the Snap version of Keepass XC? Because its based off of the latest stable version of Keepas XC.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Anyone using the Snap version of Keepass XC?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by jglen490 View PostIs there a problem with the version of KeepassXC (2.4.3+dfsg.1-1build1) in the repos?
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Sorry, I don't do SNAPs. Higher version numbers can be good, but not necessarily better. I nearly always go with what is built for the platform I'm on. Enjoy!The next brick house on the left
Intel i7 11th Gen | 16GB | 1TB | KDE Plasma 5.27.11| Kubuntu 24.04 | 6.8.0-31-generic
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Code:sudo apt-get install keepassxc Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be installed: fonts-font-awesome libdouble-conversion3 libmd4c0 libpcre2-16-0 libqrencode4 libqt5concurrent5 libqt5core5a libqt5dbus5 libqt5gui5 libqt5network5 libqt5svg5 libqt5widgets5 libqt5x11extras5 libxcb-xinerama0 libxcb-xinput0 libykpers-1-1 libyubikey-udev libyubikey0 libzxcvbn0 qt5-gtk-platformtheme qttranslations5-l10n Suggested packages: xclip webext-keepassxc-browser qt5-image-formats-plugins qtwayland5 The following NEW packages will be installed: fonts-font-awesome keepassxc libdouble-conversion3 libmd4c0 libpcre2-16-0 libqrencode4 libqt5concurrent5 libqt5core5a libqt5dbus5 libqt5gui5 libqt5network5 libqt5svg5 libqt5widgets5 libqt5x11extras5 libxcb-xinerama0 libxcb-xinput0 libykpers-1-1 libyubikey-udev libyubikey0 libzxcvbn0 qt5-gtk-platformtheme qttranslations5-l10n 0 upgraded, 22 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Need to get 17.3 MB of archives. After this operation, 67.2 MB of additional disk space will be used.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
If one has to choose between a snap and a ppa, and one isn't short on resources, snaps may be preferable because of the "containment". With ppas, it's just possible that newer versions of dependencies may not play well with existing software. I can't give examples to justify this fear but maybe someone else canKubuntu 20.04
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by chimak111 View PostIf one has to choose between a snap and a ppa, and one isn't short on resources, snaps may be preferable because of the "containment". With ppas, it's just possible that newer versions of dependencies may not play well with existing software. I can't give examples to justify this fear but maybe someone else can
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
I've been running that Snap version for a long time with no issues at all. Because it's a security app, being up to date (as well as running in a sandbox) are both good things. The Snap version also plays nice with the Firefox extension, in case you were wondering.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beerislife View PostI have it installed from the PPA with no problems on KDE Neon. I will not have Snaps or Flatpacks on my system!
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by dequire View PostWere you shaking your fist at the clouds when you typed that?
I am reminded of a time (even today) where people would scream: "I will have no third party sources on my system!!!!"
I am also reminded of a time (even today) where people would scream: "I will have no PPAs on my system!!!!"
And of course, if one goes back far enough (and even today), where people would scream: "I will have no software on my system that I did not compile myself!!!!"
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
And then, those few who say: "I will have no system on my PC that didn't originate from the divine Penguin via the aether."
Windows no longer obstructs my view.
Using Kubuntu Linux since March 23, 2007.
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." - Sherlock Holmes
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
Comment