Hi folks - simple noob-style question please
Following a reformat suddenly forced on me due apparently to a corrupted partition table (still have no idea how that happened!) in which I lost some 2 weeks of data - thank God I backed up to an external hard drive just before Christmas- I have decided to formalise my backup routine.
I've chosen Back in Time. From what I can see it works incrementally on a snapshot basis and the snapshots can go back quite a long way. I guess that subsequently copies are simply taken of those files that have been later added/changed and a note is simply made of those that have been deleted, making later snapshots a mere fraction in size of the original. So, subsequent backups should be quick and, if I accidentally delete a file, but have already backed up again, I can use back in time to go to an earlier snapshot and restore it. Alternatively, if I wipe the entire system and reinstall I can simply reinstate the latest backup. Is that the general idea of what it does?
I'm just focusing on the home directory. However, in there is a Virtualbox Win XP virtual machine which, frankly, is now only likely to be used for updating a tom-tom. The VM takes up 7 Gb. Given that it's one big file I suspect that every time I run it it will constitute a change and will be backed up in full with every snapshot, so I'm thinking I should exclude it and simply copy that over periodically. That make sense?
Finally, do those who tried to help me with my recent problem think that if I had used system rescue cd and previously backed up the partition table that I would have fixed it?
Thanks
ian
Following a reformat suddenly forced on me due apparently to a corrupted partition table (still have no idea how that happened!) in which I lost some 2 weeks of data - thank God I backed up to an external hard drive just before Christmas- I have decided to formalise my backup routine.
I've chosen Back in Time. From what I can see it works incrementally on a snapshot basis and the snapshots can go back quite a long way. I guess that subsequently copies are simply taken of those files that have been later added/changed and a note is simply made of those that have been deleted, making later snapshots a mere fraction in size of the original. So, subsequent backups should be quick and, if I accidentally delete a file, but have already backed up again, I can use back in time to go to an earlier snapshot and restore it. Alternatively, if I wipe the entire system and reinstall I can simply reinstate the latest backup. Is that the general idea of what it does?
I'm just focusing on the home directory. However, in there is a Virtualbox Win XP virtual machine which, frankly, is now only likely to be used for updating a tom-tom. The VM takes up 7 Gb. Given that it's one big file I suspect that every time I run it it will constitute a change and will be backed up in full with every snapshot, so I'm thinking I should exclude it and simply copy that over periodically. That make sense?
Finally, do those who tried to help me with my recent problem think that if I had used system rescue cd and previously backed up the partition table that I would have fixed it?
Thanks
ian
Comment