I simply hate this. It's plain stupid. No justification for this crap.
Digikam is installed WITHOUT documentation. What a clever idea! Let's hire that guy.
I find the documentation - in package digikam-doc, and install it. And it's nowhere to be found. Doesn't appear in the menu. Synaptic never tells where things are put. I have to be a minor league Linux geek and memorize the linux file system to figure this out, but what's the point? Programmers install their stuff wherever anyway.
So, I get to do a
- whoa there cowboy - did you update the system file database (
).
And all I wanted was to know what to do with pieces of the increasingly rich digikam interface.
This damn thing is simply too hard to use, and there's no excuse for it. Someone, somewhere, needs to stop dragging sticks and stones in from the forest and just clean up their bedroom.
Definitely a major usability issue. But who cares?
Digikam is installed WITHOUT documentation. What a clever idea! Let's hire that guy.
I find the documentation - in package digikam-doc, and install it. And it's nowhere to be found. Doesn't appear in the menu. Synaptic never tells where things are put. I have to be a minor league Linux geek and memorize the linux file system to figure this out, but what's the point? Programmers install their stuff wherever anyway.
So, I get to do a
Code:
locate
Code:
updatedb
And all I wanted was to know what to do with pieces of the increasingly rich digikam interface.
This damn thing is simply too hard to use, and there's no excuse for it. Someone, somewhere, needs to stop dragging sticks and stones in from the forest and just clean up their bedroom.
Definitely a major usability issue. But who cares?
Comment