I can't find a definitive answer to this anywhere.
Right now I save image metadata in Digikam only to Digikam's database. It would be convenient, however, to have the metadata stored in the images themselves (that way, when I share the pictues with family, they have my captions etc.). I know how to do this, BUT don't want to do if writing the metadata to the images (once or many times) would cause the images to degrade. In other words, does the jpeg image data get decompressed/recompressed when writing the metadata, or is it in a separate portion of the file that doesn't touch the image data?
When trying to research this, it seems that many think it depends on what software your using. Has anybody determined this (from experimentation or otherwise) for Digikam?
Thanks!!
Right now I save image metadata in Digikam only to Digikam's database. It would be convenient, however, to have the metadata stored in the images themselves (that way, when I share the pictues with family, they have my captions etc.). I know how to do this, BUT don't want to do if writing the metadata to the images (once or many times) would cause the images to degrade. In other words, does the jpeg image data get decompressed/recompressed when writing the metadata, or is it in a separate portion of the file that doesn't touch the image data?
When trying to research this, it seems that many think it depends on what software your using. Has anybody determined this (from experimentation or otherwise) for Digikam?
Thanks!!
Comment