I have a dual boot, running 9.04 on one drive, SATA, and then I installed 9.10 on an IDE drive.
The SATA drive is assigned sda by both, and is recognized as such.
the IDE drive is sdb, and also recognized by both 9.04 and 9.10 as this device identifier.
I installed Karmic to the IDE drive with the SATA drive removed, and everything went fine. The grub2 menu did not get populated with anything other than Karmic, and that is ok. I usually change the boot device from the BIOS menu when testing new releases anyway.
However, a couple weeks ago, I was playing with Grub2, trying to figure out how it works [still sadly confused] and did the update-grub command while both drives were installed. I had booted off of the IDE drive with 9.10 installed, and was trying to see if I could get changes made to the grub.cfg file and also see if the 9.04 entries would carry over.
I did get the options in grub2 changed - took out quiet and splash - but the 9.04 entries didn't appear.
I'm really not sure what the difference between the update-grub and the update-grub2 commands are, or if there really is any, but what I discovered is that when I did the update-grub command, it wiped the grub on the SATA drive, making the SATA drive unbootable.
I'm guessing that it added some grub2 bits to sda - even though sdb was the controlling drive, and after this alteration, the SATA drive wanted to a grub2 boot when it was the only drive, and had a mix of grub and grub2 stuff, making it unbootable.
It would get to the booting grub line, and then grub would report:
error - no such disk
grub rescue>
I got some of the commands to be recognized in the rescue prompt, but that didn't really help me get it to boot.
What did fix this problem was to boot into a grub 1 system and then set up grub1 again on the SATA drive. the menu.lst file was not altered, so as soon as grub1 was correctly set up, it booted fine again.
Not sure if this is a bug or just something that got weird for me.
There is another bug report, but I'm not sure if it is the same type of problem - it is filed with mythbuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...b2/+bug/414996
I really don't want to try running the update-grub command again [maybe the update-grub2 would work?] but I would like to see if I can get entries from both drives if I do move to Karmic when it is released.
Any ideas?
thanks
The SATA drive is assigned sda by both, and is recognized as such.
the IDE drive is sdb, and also recognized by both 9.04 and 9.10 as this device identifier.
I installed Karmic to the IDE drive with the SATA drive removed, and everything went fine. The grub2 menu did not get populated with anything other than Karmic, and that is ok. I usually change the boot device from the BIOS menu when testing new releases anyway.
However, a couple weeks ago, I was playing with Grub2, trying to figure out how it works [still sadly confused] and did the update-grub command while both drives were installed. I had booted off of the IDE drive with 9.10 installed, and was trying to see if I could get changes made to the grub.cfg file and also see if the 9.04 entries would carry over.
I did get the options in grub2 changed - took out quiet and splash - but the 9.04 entries didn't appear.
I'm really not sure what the difference between the update-grub and the update-grub2 commands are, or if there really is any, but what I discovered is that when I did the update-grub command, it wiped the grub on the SATA drive, making the SATA drive unbootable.
I'm guessing that it added some grub2 bits to sda - even though sdb was the controlling drive, and after this alteration, the SATA drive wanted to a grub2 boot when it was the only drive, and had a mix of grub and grub2 stuff, making it unbootable.
It would get to the booting grub line, and then grub would report:
error - no such disk
grub rescue>
I got some of the commands to be recognized in the rescue prompt, but that didn't really help me get it to boot.
What did fix this problem was to boot into a grub 1 system and then set up grub1 again on the SATA drive. the menu.lst file was not altered, so as soon as grub1 was correctly set up, it booted fine again.
Not sure if this is a bug or just something that got weird for me.
There is another bug report, but I'm not sure if it is the same type of problem - it is filed with mythbuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...b2/+bug/414996
I really don't want to try running the update-grub command again [maybe the update-grub2 would work?] but I would like to see if I can get entries from both drives if I do move to Karmic when it is released.
Any ideas?
thanks
Comment