Okay, hopefully somebody with some routing experience can help me out. I think my problem might be pretty simple to solve. I tinkered around with some different route commands but nothing has worked so far. I'm trying to create a virtual net of windows 2003 servers running in VirtualBox on a laptop. Where it gets tricky is I'm creating a tap interface that I bridge to from the virtual machines. I'm not having any problems with the tap interface or the bridging from VirtualBox. It works but I can't ping my router or outside addresses from the virtual machines unless I bridge to eth0 and keep the VMs on the same subnet as my router. When I bridge to the tap interface, tap0, I can ping eth0 on my laptop but that's as far as I get. It's safe to assume I need to modify my routing table or maybe enable packet forwarding. I posted my interface and route information from the ip command.
In a nutshell, eth0 on the laptop is 192.168.0.3, assigned its address from a router at 192.168.0.1. I set the tap interface to use 192.168.100.1. My VM bridges to the tap interface and uses a static IP of 192.168.100.2. It uses the tap interface as its gateway. I'm able to ping all the internal addresses from the host or the VM. My only problem is reaching the router and outside addresses from the windows VM. I wouldn't bother with this configuration if one of my virtual machines was not a domain controller. It needs a static IP address and the eth0 address on my laptop changes so I can't bridge to eth0 and use DHCP.
In a nutshell, eth0 on the laptop is 192.168.0.3, assigned its address from a router at 192.168.0.1. I set the tap interface to use 192.168.100.1. My VM bridges to the tap interface and uses a static IP of 192.168.100.2. It uses the tap interface as its gateway. I'm able to ping all the internal addresses from the host or the VM. My only problem is reaching the router and outside addresses from the windows VM. I wouldn't bother with this configuration if one of my virtual machines was not a domain controller. It needs a static IP address and the eth0 address on my laptop changes so I can't bridge to eth0 and use DHCP.
Code:
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 100 link/ether 00:1c:25:10:e7:33 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.3/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::21c:25ff:fe10:e733/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: wmaster0: <UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 0 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ieee802.11 00:1b:77:90:e6:43 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 4: wlan0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:1b:77:90:e6:43 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 5: vboxnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 0a:00:27:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: pan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN link/ether b6:50:83:8a:65:19 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: tap0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 500 link/ether fe:b5:c8:70:b2:5f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.100.1/24 brd 192.168.100.255 scope global tap0 inet6 fe80::fcb5:c8ff:fe70:b25f/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 192.168.100.0/24 dev tap0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.100.1 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.3 default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0
Comment