If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You will have to register
before you can post. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Please do not use the CODE tag when pasting content that contains formatting (colored, bold, underline, italic, etc).
The CODE tag displays all content as plain text, including the formatting tags, making it difficult to read.
Crap. What else can we try? This is a slightly different error, now, right?
First thing: yes, that was an --initial , in the script, thanks, you fixed that though, right?
(think you did in 8).
Can you run "dpkg --get-selections |grep fglrx" and see if it really installed it all? (compare with your local debs , you may need to run the same with a different grep if there is a package name that doesn;t include the string "fglrx")
I think at this point we need to see the contents of the X log file in /var/log (see the other thread for details). We need to focus on errors (EE) and warnings (WW).
My hunch is that we are almost there but there is some remnant of an old installation interfering, I know you have the same feeling. How frustrating!
Also, a few hours ago they released Catalyst 9.7 -- I am running it now, I don;t think it will make a difference but hey, you tried so many things ...
glxinfo |grep vendor
still tells me
Error: unable to open display
I'm thinking this is because X isn't running?
lspci -nn |grep VGA
tells me
01:00:0 vga compatible controller [0300] ATI Technologies Inc RV630 Pro AGP [Radeon HD2600 Pro AGP] [1002:9587]
which is correct
dpkg -S /etc/ati/control
still tells me
xorg-driver-fglrx: /etc/ati/control
dpkg --get-selections |grep fglrx
still tells me
fglrx-amdcccle install
fglrx-kernel-source install
fglrx-modaliases install
xorg-driver-fglrx install
xorg-driver-fglrx-dev install
xorg-driver-fglrx-envy deinstall
apt-get remove --purge xorg-driver-fglrx-envy
still tells me 'is not installed, so not removed'
/etc/ati/control
is there now
aticonfig --initial=check
tells me
found fglrx section
maybe I should try
aticonfig --resolution=Screen0,W1028xH768 ??
aticonfig --query-monitor
tells me
Default Adapter- ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro AGP (which is right)
ati_dm: XWindows is not running (only too too true ...) or $Display is not set
I have no idea what $Display is or where it is stored
[/quote]
I think at this point we need to see the contents of the X log file in /var/log (see the other thread for details). We need to focus on errors (EE) and warnings (WW).
[/quote]
I'll look that up next
WE'RE ALL BETTER OFF WHEN WE'RE ALL BETTER OFF<br />User # 17645
I think at this point we need to see the contents of the X log file in /var/log
(WW) The directory '/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic" does not exist
Entry deleted from font path
(II) Primary device is: PCI 01@00:00:0
(WW) Falling back to old probe method for fglrx
(WW) This ATI Proprietary Linux Driver does not guarantee support of video driver ABI higher than 2.0
(WW) Video driver ABI version of the X server is 5.0
(II) fglrx(0): Display1: No EDID information from DOC
(EE) fglrx(0): Unknown EDID version 0
(II) fglrx(0): driver needs X.org 1.4.x.y with x.y>=99.906
(WW) fglrx(0): could not detect X server version (query_status=-1)
(WW) fglrx(0): Option "VendorName" is not used
(WW) fglrx(0): Option "ModelName" is not used
(WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x23 (etc-there are about 80 listed)
WE'RE ALL BETTER OFF WHEN WE'RE ALL BETTER OFF<br />User # 17645
when it came up, the main screen looked fine, but the taskbar/panel/thingy across the bottom was still all streaky- like someone had dragged a fine comb through wet pixels from one end to the other. I went in K > System > System Settings > Display [note to self: who invented that, and will they share whatever they're on ...] to find the default resolution set at 2048Wx768H. No wonder it "wasn't supported" ... Changed it back to 1024x768 and all was well
go figure ...
other oddities included not having Konsole or any package mgmt interface there: I googled around a bit and solved most of it by installing kdebase ... an upgrade that doesn't include kdebase
hooodahthunkit ...
WE'RE ALL BETTER OFF WHEN WE'RE ALL BETTER OFF<br />User # 17645
Comment