Upgraded today from 8.10 using the panel notification method.
Slight hiccup during download of packages and download halted. Rebooted and continued download. Upgrade semed to go okay from there.
Rebooted and 2.6.28-11 entries for 9.04 missing from boot menu.
Booted 8.10, 2.6.27-11, the old default.
Mucked about in the /boot directory and used the grub tool in the system settings to add 2.6.28-11 generic and recovery mode. Got it wrong the first time and got the grub error "Invalid or unsupported Executable Format" and dropped back to the menu. Booted 8.10 and mucked about some more and found out what I got wrong, fixed and booted 2.6.28-11-generic.
On login, KDE 4.1 is booted and not 4.2 ( anyway I assume it is 4.1 since the boot splash screen says 4.1 and not 4.2). The appearance seems different so maybe it is actually 4.2.
So why doesn't the upgrade add the proper entries to the grub boot menu? The grub editor won't let me elevate the new entries to the top so I may have to manually edit the file.
Why doesn't KDE 4.2 boot instead of 4.1 and if it is actually 4.2, why wasn't the splash screen updated during the upgrade
Having problems with the new HPLIP toolbox - it is unable to find the proper su/sudo plugin.
I may have to fall back to the better method and download the CD and do a proper installation. Had to do the same when upgrading from 7 to 8 and from 8.04 to 8.10.
Upgrades of Kubuntu just don't seem to work properly. Seems like it is always necessary to do a proper format of the boot partition and installation. That wipes out all of the old stuff that the upgrade leaves hanging around to foul up proper working.
Well I notice that the NVidia 180 driver is the recommended driver under 9.04. I'll test it out to see if it works. I have not been able to get ANY NVidia driver working. They always do REALLY, REALLY bad things to my set-up including fouling up the boot process.
Since I will be doing a new installation anyway, if it does foul things up royally as always, I won't feel bad and just proceed on the installation.
Slight hiccup during download of packages and download halted. Rebooted and continued download. Upgrade semed to go okay from there.
Rebooted and 2.6.28-11 entries for 9.04 missing from boot menu.
Booted 8.10, 2.6.27-11, the old default.
Mucked about in the /boot directory and used the grub tool in the system settings to add 2.6.28-11 generic and recovery mode. Got it wrong the first time and got the grub error "Invalid or unsupported Executable Format" and dropped back to the menu. Booted 8.10 and mucked about some more and found out what I got wrong, fixed and booted 2.6.28-11-generic.
On login, KDE 4.1 is booted and not 4.2 ( anyway I assume it is 4.1 since the boot splash screen says 4.1 and not 4.2). The appearance seems different so maybe it is actually 4.2.
So why doesn't the upgrade add the proper entries to the grub boot menu? The grub editor won't let me elevate the new entries to the top so I may have to manually edit the file.
Why doesn't KDE 4.2 boot instead of 4.1 and if it is actually 4.2, why wasn't the splash screen updated during the upgrade
Having problems with the new HPLIP toolbox - it is unable to find the proper su/sudo plugin.
I may have to fall back to the better method and download the CD and do a proper installation. Had to do the same when upgrading from 7 to 8 and from 8.04 to 8.10.
Upgrades of Kubuntu just don't seem to work properly. Seems like it is always necessary to do a proper format of the boot partition and installation. That wipes out all of the old stuff that the upgrade leaves hanging around to foul up proper working.
Well I notice that the NVidia 180 driver is the recommended driver under 9.04. I'll test it out to see if it works. I have not been able to get ANY NVidia driver working. They always do REALLY, REALLY bad things to my set-up including fouling up the boot process.
Since I will be doing a new installation anyway, if it does foul things up royally as always, I won't feel bad and just proceed on the installation.
Comment