Did anyone else see this blog post about Adept and the next version of Kubuntu (9.04)?
http://blog.nixternal.com/2008.12.12...y-and-kubuntu/
Here's a relevant quote:
I'm not sure KPackageKit is going to be great, but it is interesting to read that the consensus among decision makers is that Adept is not good enough. I certainly agree.
http://blog.nixternal.com/2008.12.12...y-and-kubuntu/
Here's a relevant quote:
Package management wise, it seems there was a consensus on switching from Adept to KPackageKit. We do understand there is a lot of work that still needs to be completed with KPackageKit, and the Kubuntu ninjas will do their best to get it up to speed. If something was to happen, and we were unable to deliver on KPackageKit, then we have Adept to fall back to. My question I just thought of is this, “If we use Adept as a fallback, shouldn’t we still try to fix it as well?” Wouldn’t it make sense to continue working on Adept side-by-side with KPackageKit, just in case we do not finish KPackageKit in time? I think so.
Comment