I am running Feisty Fawn on a Pentium 4 computer with 1Gb RAM. I boot from an IDE drive (160 Gb) but have a secondary drive, a SATA drive with 200 Gb space.
This secondary drive is used exclusively for network storage. [I also have a computer running Win2K on my LAN.] Right now I have the SATA disk partitioned with two (2) partitions, one FAT32 and the other ext3.
My question is this: since this SATA drive is used EXCLUSIVELY for storage, how should I format it? Particularly in the light of running backup from both my Windows computer and my Linux computer using tar to create tarballs. I will NOT be accessing the SATA drive from my Windows computer, but will be copying the files FROM the Windows computer having mounted the necessary shares on my Linux computer and treating the files as local files.
(1) Is fat32 more / less efficient in storage than ext3?
(2) Should I consider some other format for this storage?
(3) What are the pros and cons for fat32 and ext3?
(4) What am I overlooking? What other considerations should I be considering?
Thanks for your insight and input!
This secondary drive is used exclusively for network storage. [I also have a computer running Win2K on my LAN.] Right now I have the SATA disk partitioned with two (2) partitions, one FAT32 and the other ext3.
My question is this: since this SATA drive is used EXCLUSIVELY for storage, how should I format it? Particularly in the light of running backup from both my Windows computer and my Linux computer using tar to create tarballs. I will NOT be accessing the SATA drive from my Windows computer, but will be copying the files FROM the Windows computer having mounted the necessary shares on my Linux computer and treating the files as local files.
(1) Is fat32 more / less efficient in storage than ext3?
(2) Should I consider some other format for this storage?
(3) What are the pros and cons for fat32 and ext3?
(4) What am I overlooking? What other considerations should I be considering?
Thanks for your insight and input!
Comment