Originally posted by oshunluvr
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What to do after install links
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Nasty7 View PostAnyhow, I just want things to be as fast as possible like many do. For instance, I wanted a fast Drive, but didn't want an SSD. So I researched till my eyes bled and found that the WD Black 500GB was a tick faster than most of the same type. Didn't want a hybrid, don't have a new enough pc for M.2, so there you go, the WD Black 500 is what I got. I've experimented with "Preload", but don't know that it helped all that much. Most likely just a little but that was undetectable to me. In fact Preload is still installed on my old KDE Laptop, and is still running well. I really want an M.2 Drive to see how much faster it will make things, but money is tight and only have one pc that will accept an M.2 via an adapter.
I will say unequivocally if you're looking for speed it's hard to beat any SSD over any hard drive. All the stories about being less reliable or whatever are total bunk. Yes, maybe back when the tech was new-ish to the consumer market, like 2005-6, but I've got 2 Samsung 840 Pros with more than 3 years of power-on hours still chugging along without a single glitch and my new M.2 Samsung 970 Pro is lightyears faster than them.
Just for fun, in this order; WD Black 2TB (sda), WD Red 2TB (sdb), Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (sdc + sdd), Samsung 970 Pro 512GB (nvme0n1):
Code:[FONT=monospace][COLOR=#54FF54][B]stuart@office[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000]:[/COLOR][COLOR=#54FFFF][B]~[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000]$ for d in sda sdb sdc sdd nvme0n1; do sudo hdparm -t /dev/$d ; done[/COLOR] /dev/sda: Timing buffered disk reads: 432 MB in 3.00 seconds = 143.76 MB/sec /dev/sdb: Timing buffered disk reads: 416 MB in 3.01 seconds = 138.12 MB/sec /dev/sdc: Timing buffered disk reads: 1600 MB in 3.00 seconds = 532.80 MB/sec /dev/sdd: Timing buffered disk reads: 1600 MB in 3.00 seconds = 533.11 MB/sec /dev/nvme0n1: Timing buffered disk reads: 9700 MB in 3.00 seconds = 3232.69 MB/sec [/FONT]
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by SpecialEd View PostI suggest you make a sandwich, get your favorite beverage and take a tour through the system settings.
...EVER!
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snowhog View Post(emphasis added)
I'm confused. Your other thread at https://www.kubuntuforums.net/showth...Password-Issue would seem to indicate that your wifi password issue isn't over.
Thanks for all the help"Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF, 8GB RAM, i7 3770, Kubuntu 18.04, MB 051FJ8
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by jlittle View PostAn advantage of a separate swap partition is that it can be used by several installs.
Originally posted by oshunluvr View PostAnother case where a swap partition is better is if you dual boot or have multiple installs. They can all share a single swap partition but if you have one swap file per install, the space used is multiplied.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by oshunluvr View PostI had a couple 1TB WD "Blacks" back in the day.
I will say unequivocally if you're looking for speed it's hard to beat any SSD over any hard drive. All the stories about being less reliable or whatever are total bunk. Yes, maybe back when the tech was new-ish to the consumer market, like 2005-6, but I've got 2 Samsung 840 Pros with more than 3 years of power-on hours still chugging along without a single glitch and my new M.2 Samsung 970 Pro is lightyears faster than them.
One thing that was interesting is the WD Black 500GB was faster than the 1TB drive at least for the 2.5" in my situation, and faster than the 250GB.Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF, 8GB RAM, i7 3770, Kubuntu 18.04, MB 051FJ8
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
Comment