The issue you have ‘with us’ (?) isn’t anything to do with us. I am 100% certain of that.
As to your ‘message’. Unfortunately, the entirety of the boot process isn’t logged, and that’s by design. I’m not saying that the design is good. In fact, many years ago, here in KFN, we had a member (no longer with us) who was incredibly knowledgable about Linux, and it was (still) possible (then) to re-enable the ‘turned-off’ unlogged part of the boot sequence. Sadly, that ability (to turn back on) was permanently removed from the kernel years ago. (All of this is ‘IIRC’. I’ve tried finding the posts I had with this member, but without success. It may be that I was communicating with him via email, and if that was the case, I don’t have emails from that far back.)
As to your ‘message’. Unfortunately, the entirety of the boot process isn’t logged, and that’s by design. I’m not saying that the design is good. In fact, many years ago, here in KFN, we had a member (no longer with us) who was incredibly knowledgable about Linux, and it was (still) possible (then) to re-enable the ‘turned-off’ unlogged part of the boot sequence. Sadly, that ability (to turn back on) was permanently removed from the kernel years ago. (All of this is ‘IIRC’. I’ve tried finding the posts I had with this member, but without success. It may be that I was communicating with him via email, and if that was the case, I don’t have emails from that far back.)
Comment