Re: ubuntu fonts look different
Nailed it. It's hinting style. Only "medium" and "full" render the Ubuntu font correctly. "Slight" or "none" renders it fatty-fat-fat, regardless of rendering type (sub-pixel or not).
And also, it does indeed seem to be a QT-only issue, as Firefox looks fine while KDE is all bold
Gonna file it at launchpad as a bug.
Nailed it. It's hinting style. Only "medium" and "full" render the Ubuntu font correctly. "Slight" or "none" renders it fatty-fat-fat, regardless of rendering type (sub-pixel or not).
And also, it does indeed seem to be a QT-only issue, as Firefox looks fine while KDE is all bold
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d648b/d648b1ea292eb85c9df08ff8a2241dfccc98ba41" alt="Smiley"
Comment