GTK Style lost after update to KDE 4.6

[FreshFlesh]

Re: GTK Style lost after update to KDE 4.6

i get this

http://img819.imageshack.us/i/snapshot2ku.png/

when trying to install the deb file

option 2

or

recompile the kernel with the patch 363 from con kolivas. When i recompiled the kernel i had installed the above kernel and used the configuration created.

i used this tutorial to recompile kernel 2.6.37 with patch 363 from con kolivas>

http://www.question-defense.com/2010...pecific-device

i downloaded the patch 363 from here>

http://users.on.net/~ckolivas/kernel/


good luck...

regards

is just not for me

question... why ?!?!?!?!?!?

[geneiros]

Re: GTK Style lost after update to KDE 4.6

edit>

sorry, you were installing the headers...

try installing first the headers-all

then headers

and final image

[FreshFlesh]

Re: GTK Style lost after update to KDE 4.6

Actually I could not install the headers at all, but I could install the image.

master@master-Lenovo-G550:~$ uname -a
Linux master-Lenovo-G550 2.6.37-020637-generic #201101050908 SMP Wed Jan 5 10:17:13 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux

At least I think...

Hurt to be a noob

Any advice ? Is this ok, even if I could not install the header ? Any thing I should do be4 installing header ? Am I in any trouble right now?

Currently running Kubuntu 10.10 Kde 4.6 and apparently kernel 2.6.37-020637-generic

Header can't be installed even after image ...

[geneiros]

Re: GTK Style lost after update to KDE 4.6

the headers are only nedded to recompile your kernel, or to compile software like the nvidia drivers...

you can use only the image i think...

[FreshFlesh]

Re: GTK Style lost after update to KDE 4.6

I did as you said

edit>

try installing first the headers-all

then headers

and final image

and worked without problems .

now i have this

master@master-Lenovo-G550:~$ uname -a
Linux master-Lenovo-G550 2.6.37-020637-generic #201101050908 SMP Wed Jan 5 10:17:13 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux

witch is identical with the one be4.

What about the patch 363. Is it for x32 OS as well ?

As far as I could tell is for x64 systems only. Am I right ?

[geneiros]

Re: GTK Style lost after update to KDE 4.6

the patch is for any architecture...

it increase the performance when the computer is at stress like converting a avi to dvd...

i first saw this patch working in pclinuxos and the performance was very good...

see here the page from con kolivas

http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/

and here the test performance between ubuntu and pclinuxos>

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag..._fourway&num=2





if you want you can apply other patch like the cgroups patch, that increase a little bit the performance in stress situations...

see here>

http://www.webupd8.org/2010/11/scrip...200-lines.html


cheers

[FreshFlesh]

Re: GTK Style lost after update to KDE 4.6

Don't get me wrong, but if they increase performance, why are they not included in an update ? Just curious, not flaming or anything. And why different patches? Are they specifically designed for a certain thing, or overall performance?
Do i have to choose one , or are they compatible? Many questions from the new guy

[geneiros]

Re: GTK Style lost after update to KDE 4.6

i think that cgroups patch is included in 2.6.38

with the bfs patch i have the same question like you...

in ubuntu we have only the generic kernel, we dont have a desktop kernel like in mandriva, opensuse, arch, etc...

only 250hz kernel

but i made some tests and with a 1000hz kernel the system sometimes feels a little bit slower...


i think that the rt kernel is again available in natty, but i dont know...the rt kernel is a 1000hz kernel by the way...

[FreshFlesh]

Re: GTK Style lost after update to KDE 4.6

in ubuntu we have only the generic kernel, we dont have a desktop kernel like in mandriva, opensuse, arch, etc...

only 250hz kernel

but i made some tests and with a 1000hz kernel the system sometimes feels a little bit slower...


i think that the rt kernel is again available in natty, but i dont know...the rt kernel is a 1000hz kernel by the way...

wow... I have no idea what you're talking about... but I guess that's a no to compatibility issues... :P

i could assume that a 1000hz kernel is 4 times faster than a 250hz one, but that sounds silly... to me...

i've decided that my system is fast enough for me and i wont mess with it further more.

Thank you all for the help !