Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Secondary HD problem

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Re: Secondary HD problem

    Meh. For reasons that are beyond me, my debian sid 2.6.37 kernel is not doing anything at all with the "compress" and "space_cache" mount options -- they do not show up in the output of the "mount" command, after I have added them to /etc/fstab, and enabled them with "mount -a". I ran my little file transfer timing test, to be sure, and there is zero difference before and after enabling the options. So, I think I'm suffering from "early-adopteritis" on this one.

    Hmmmm. I wonder if I can install Natty on a VM, using a btrfs filesystem ......

    Comment


      #17
      Re: Secondary HD problem

      dmesg should show

      [230344.699298] btrfs: enabling disk space caching
      [230344.699304] btrfs: forcing compression

      Please Read Me

      Comment


        #18
        Re: Secondary HD problem

        Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

        Yeah, you are correct oshunluvr:


        Code:
        [  16.122047] btrfs: use compression
        [  16.122049] btrfs: enabling disk space caching
        and, moreover, after rebooting "mount" now shows:

        Code:
        devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=620)
        /dev/sde on /mnt/DATA type btrfs (rw,device=/dev/sdd,device=/dev/sde,compress,space_cache)
        /dev/sdc1 on /mnt/REVODATA type ext4 (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,commit=300)
        so, I guess the answer is, it requires a system reboot to actually take effect -- "mount -a" is not sufficient.

        Interesting!

        And THANKS!


        Comment


          #19
          Re: Secondary HD problem

          Did your speed pick up at all?

          Please Read Me

          Comment


            #20
            Re: Secondary HD problem

            We're about 15 minutes from knowing the answer to that!

            Comment


              #21
              Re: Secondary HD problem

              Well, here are the measured results -- read 'em and weep:

              BTRFS Copy Speed Test

              Without space_cache and compress options
              Large File From To Time
              1 ext4 btrfs 1:33
              2 btrfs ext4 3:54
              Small Files
              1 ext4 btrfs 0:04
              2 btrfs ext4 0:01

              With space_cache and compress options
              Large File From To Time
              1 ext4 btrfs 1:52
              2 btrfs ext4 3:48
              Small Files
              1 ext4 btrfs 0:04
              2 btrfs ext4 0:01



              Large file is a 16.3GB video (.mp3)

              Small files is a directory with 2,485 small files and 50 sub-directories, total size about 320MB.

              Nothing that will change anyone's life, so far.

              Comment

              Working...
              X