Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CVE-2010-3081 kernel: 64-bit Compatibility Mode Stack Pointer Underflow

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Re: CVE-2010-3081 kernel: 64-bit Compatibility Mode Stack Pointer Underflow

    Most people run computers older than 4 years old?

    If that were true then Win7 has an extremely low uptake!

    IMO, older laptops (from the expensive side of the spectrum) were well built and would last a long time, except for the battery and CMOS clock on the mobo. BUT, they lack the performance that most people prefer, IF they can afford to upgrade to the higher performing machines. I installed Puppy 4.3.1 on a 12 year old Toshiba Tecra 8100 a couple weeks ago. Win95 was on the Tecra but was too slow and bug infested to be useful. I found out Sunday that the original battery STILL runs it for about 15 minutes! But, with an under powered CPU, 800X600 max screen, no touch pad but a slightly worn toggle button, and USB 1.0, 2565MB RAM, and a 10GB HD most people who could afford to would buy a newer, less than 4 year old, computer even if it is used, just to get the 64bit, fast CPU, big memory, built in wireless and large HD.
    "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
    – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

    Comment


      #17
      Re: CVE-2010-3081 kernel: 64-bit Compatibility Mode Stack Pointer Underflow

      Originally posted by GreyGeek
      Most people run computers older than 4 years old?

      If that were true then Win7 has an extremely low uptake!
      Haha =D But I didn't said that. I said:
      "So most people will have a 32-bit CPU if their PC is >=4 years."
      To clarify it even more: IF people have a PC that's 4 years old or even older, they would likely have a 32-bit CPU, since most PC's ship with Intel, and Intel made the switch to produce 64-bit CPU's only a few years ago. So if people have a PC older than 4 years, they most likely have 32-bit. That's what I meant.
      Most important laptop specs (this is my main computer, with Kubuntu on it):<br /><br />4096MB RAM (DDR2)<br />500GB Hard Disk<br />ATI Mobility Radeon 4570HD Videocard with 512MB GDDR3 RAM, up to 2280MB VRAM<br />Intel® Core™ 2 Duo-processor T6600<br /><br />OS: Kubuntu 10.10

      Comment


        #18
        Re: CVE-2010-3081 kernel: 64-bit Compatibility Mode Stack Pointer Underflow

        Originally posted by Vistaus
        .....
        Haha =D But I didn't said that. I said:
        "So most people will have a 32-bit CPU if their PC is >=4 years."...
        That you did. I misread. My apologies.
        "A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
        – John F. Kennedy, February 26, 1962.

        Comment


          #19
          Re: CVE-2010-3081 kernel: 64-bit Compatibility Mode Stack Pointer Underflow

          It's okay @GreyGeek, happens
          Most important laptop specs (this is my main computer, with Kubuntu on it):<br /><br />4096MB RAM (DDR2)<br />500GB Hard Disk<br />ATI Mobility Radeon 4570HD Videocard with 512MB GDDR3 RAM, up to 2280MB VRAM<br />Intel® Core™ 2 Duo-processor T6600<br /><br />OS: Kubuntu 10.10

          Comment


            #20
            Re: CVE-2010-3081 kernel: 64-bit Compatibility Mode Stack Pointer Underflow

            I want to install the 64-bit version, but when I click to download it, it wants to download the amd64 version. Is that the one for Intel also?

            Thanks.
            'I must have a prodigious quantity of mind; it takes me as much as a week sometimes to make it up.' Mark Twain

            Comment


              #21
              Re: CVE-2010-3081 kernel: 64-bit Compatibility Mode Stack Pointer Underflow

              Originally posted by joneall
              I want to install the 64-bit version, but when I click to download it, it wants to download the amd64 version. Is that the one for Intel also?
              YES. Read down to "Industry Naming Conventions" here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64

              Comment

              Working...
              X