Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[SOLVED] Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    [SOLVED] Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

    [Update (see below the details): HAL will be mostly removed in Lucid, but no completely gone, because some software still depends on it.]


    Hi

    I keep reading that hal is deprecated and unplugged in different places (including xserver). However, I still see 5 hal packages (including the one names hal). Removing any of them would trigger removal of kubuntu-desktop (ans some other packages). Any thoughts anyone? Maybe the clean up is not complete? Should this be reported sooner than later?

    In particular, I just had a hal error preventing me from mounting a partition in Dolphin by simply clicking on it ...

    Thanks!

    #2
    Re: Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

    Yeah - that's flippin' annoying. Apparently if you have a mount defined in fstab, hal won't automount it. If yuo don't have if in fstab, it will be mounted in /media/XXX.

    Please Read Me

    Comment


      #3
      Re: Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

      Good point in general, I've seen that happen, but it's not the case here

      Code:
      proc      /proc      proc  defaults    0    0
      # / was on /dev/sdb3 during installation
      UUID=e1c15c83-23cf-4bfb-a043-ba9469332293 /       ext4  relatime,errors=remount-ro 0    1
      
      # /home was on /dev/sdb4 during installation
      UUID=c7b059d3-f50a-48b9-95fa-35635b214ec1 /home      xfs   relatime    0    2
      
      # swap was on /dev/sda2 during installation
      UUID=943bc554-beeb-4a3b-85f6-133754e3e4be none      swap  sw       0    0
      
      # swap was on /dev/sdb2 during installation                                             
      UUID=ab10890f-a997-4fc7-a28c-942e38a627b3 none      swap  sw       0    0                     
      /dev/scd0    /media/cdrom0  udf,iso9660 user,noauto,exec,utf8 0    0                             
                                                                         
      # /media/disk for backups, by Leo                                                  
      UUID=c4b99ec1-e440-4066-84a9-7f561e631dbd /media/backups xfs   relatime    0    2
      I am trying to mount /dev/sdb1

      Code:
      leo@grisell:~$ sudo blkid /dev/sdb1                                                 
      /dev/sdb1: UUID="fff011a2-5131-4ba5-a1ea-f8c18b3a3859" TYPE="ext4"
      Thanks in any case, it will be useful to other people, especially in Karmic. I am more generally curious about the status of hal in Lucid ...

      Comment


        #4
        Re: Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

        I have a few hal packages on my system as well .....but clicking one of my 2 drives that arnt in fstab in the places panel in dolphin dose mount them (2 windows partitions).

        have you tryed to mount it the old way (IE: with mkdir and mount)? ..........or add it to fstab? ....or is this not desirabel.



        VINNY
        i7 4core HT 8MB L3 2.9GHz
        16GB RAM
        Nvidia GTX 860M 4GB RAM 1152 cuda cores

        Comment


          #5
          Re: Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

          Hi Vinny

          Yeah, I should kick the tires a bit, try to mount manually, etc. It's not a big deal for me, I am wondering if we need to report this in Launchpad for the most thing (this is one of the reasons I run Lucid)

          Cheers!

          Comment


            #6
            Re: Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

            I just found this, apparently there is no clarity on whether HAL will be removed in Lucid:
            http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1381844

            Comment


              #7
              Re: Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

              23meg on the Ubuntu testing forum explained it well here.
              Boot Info Script

              Comment


                #8
                Re: Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

                Originally posted by verndog
                23meg on the Ubuntu testing forum explained it well here.
                Thanks verndog, that's pretty clear!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

                  In particular, I just had a hal error preventing me from mounting a partition in Dolphin by simply clicking on it ...
                  Earlier > Topic: Lucids upgrade to 4.4 beta breaks disk mounting?


                  Shortly:

                  A bug report > Bug #500205: Dolphin in 4.4 Betas 1&2 Fails to mount internal drives other than root.


                  => A workaround (working here) is to start the Dolphin as root (kdesudo dolphin) and then the mount is possible. The unmounting is possible as an ordinary user.

                  The kdesudo/kdesu is also having hickups > Topic: [RESOLVED - NOT] kdesudo - bug report filed
                  Before you edit, BACKUP !

                  Why there are dead links ?
                  1. Thread: Please explain how to access old kubuntu forum posts
                  2. Thread: Lost Information

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Re: Wasn't hal supposed to be removed in Lucid?

                    Thank you all for the good info.

                    In particular, Rog131 _once_again_ hit the nail on the head! I just subscribed to the bug report.

                    I will close this thread as [SOLVED] since my main question was about HAL, and follow up in the other KFN thread pointed by Rog

                    Cheers!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X